ArticleActa radiologica open2022
Observer performance evaluation of the feasibility of a deep learning model to detect cardiomegaly on chest radiographs.
Article in Acta radiologica open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for the Classification of Left Ventricle Segments by Hypertrophy Severity.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Using a Deep Learning-Based Decision Support System to Predict Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Using Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Deep learning framework for vertebral heart size and cardiothoracic ratio estimation in dogs and cats using thoracic radiographs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence as a proficient tool in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis in massive population screening programs: a case study in Chennai, India.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Measurement of Cardiothoracic Ratio on Chest X-rays Using Artificial Intelligence-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep Learning in Cardiothoracic Ratio Calculation and Cardiomegaly Detection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Performance of a Deep Learning-Based Automatic Measurement Model for Measuring the Cardiothoracic Ratio on Chest Radiographs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Validation of an Automated Cardiothoracic Ratio Calculation for Hemodialysis Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Detecting Chest Pathologies from Digital Chest Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Performance of a Chest Radiography AI Algorithm for Detection of Missed or Mislabeled Findings: A Multicenter Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) is the ratio of the diameter of the heart to the diameter of the thorax. An abnormal CTR (>0.55) is often an indicator of an underlying pathological condition. The accurate prediction of an abnormal CTR chest X-rays (CXRs) aids in the early diagnosis of clinical conditions. Purpose: We propose a deep learning (DL)-based model for automatic CTR calculation to assist radiologists with rapid diagnosis of cardiomegaly and thus optimise the radiology flow. Material and Methods: The study population included 1012 posteroanterior CXRs from a single institution. The Attention U-Net DL architecture was used for the automatic calculation of CTR. An observer performance test was conducted to assess the radiologist's performance in diagnosing cardiomegaly with and without artificial intelligence assistance. Results: U-Net model exhibited a sensitivity of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.85], specificity >99%, precision of 0.99 [95% CI: 0.98, 1], and a F1 score of 0.88 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.91]. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the reviewing radiologist in identifying cardiomegaly increased from 40.50% to 88.4% when aided by the AI-generated CTR. Conclusion: Our segmentation-based AI model demonstrated high specificity (>99%) and sensitivity (80%) for CTR calculation. The performance of the radiologist on the observer performance test improved significantly with provision of AI assistance. A DL-based segmentation model for rapid quantification of CTR can therefore have significant potential to be used in clinical workflows by reducing radiologists' burden and alerting to an abnormal enlarged heart early on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.