Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899104›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2022

Antibody persistence following administration of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines at 12-24 months of age and safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T in healthy infants in India.

S Mangarule, S Palkar, M Mitra, M D Ravi, R Singh, A Moureau, M V Jayanth, D M Patel, S Ravinuthala, B N Patnaik and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

S MangaruleSanofi Healthcare India Private Ltd (SHIPL), Hyderabad, India.
S PalkarBharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Medical College, Pune, India.
M MitraInstitute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.
M D RaviJSS Academy of Higher Education, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysore, India.
R SinghMaulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
A MoureauSanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France.
M V JayanthSanofi Healthcare India Private Ltd (SHIPL), Hyderabad, India.
D M PatelSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
S RavinuthalaSanofi Healthcare India Private Ltd (SHIPL), Hyderabad, India.
B N PatnaikSanofi Healthcare India Private Ltd (SHIPL), Hyderabad, India.
E JordanovSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
F NoriegaSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
Sanofi (India) · INSanofi (United States) · USBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INInstitute of Child Health · INJSS Medical College and Hospital · INMaulana Azad Medical College · INSanofi (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The combination of whole-cell pertussis (wP) antigens with established diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), hepatitis B (HB), Methods: Phase II, open-label, randomized study. Healthy toddlers who had previously completed a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV primary vaccination series received a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T booster vaccine at 12-24 months of age. All participants had also received 1 or 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine between primary vaccination and enrolment (N = 100 and N = 6, respectively). Those who had received 1 prior measles-containing vaccine received an MMR dose either concomitantly (N = 50) or 28 days after (N = 50) the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T booster. Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays and safety by parental reports. Results: Pre-booster vaccination, 100.0% participants showed antibody persistence after DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T or DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV for anti-T (≥0.01 IU/mL), anti-Hib (≥0.15 µg/mL), and anti-polio 3 (≥8 1/dil) and at least 95.8% of participants for anti-D (≥0.01 IU/mL), anti-HB (≥10 mIU/mL), and anti-polio 1 and 2 (≥8 1/dil). For the pertussis antigens, pre-booster antibody persistence (≥2 EU/mL) ranged from 88.6 to 88.7% (anti-PT), 91.4-98.6% (anti-FHA), 69.0-74.3% (anti-PRN), and 97.1-97.2% (anti-FIM). For the booster response, seroprotection based on either the primary series or measles-containing vaccination regimen was 100.0% for anti-D and anti-T (≥0.01 IU/mL and ≥0.10 IU/mL), anti-HB (≥10 mIU/mL and ≥100 mIU/mL), anti-Hib (≥0.15 µg/mL and ≥1 µg/mL) and anti-polio 1, 2, and 3 (≥8 1/dil), and for the pertussis antigens booster response ranged from 88.6 to 91.8% (anti-PT), 91.1-95.9% (anti-FHA), 88.6-93.9% (anti-PRN), and 95.9-98.6% (anti-FIM). There were no safety concerns in any group. Conclusions: This study showed good antibody persistence of the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine and good immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose given with MMR in the second year of life.Clinical Trials Registry India Number: CTRI/2018/04/013375.

Indexed as

BoosterCoadministrationHexavalentMMRVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35899104
PMCPMC9309395
OpenAlexW4283776680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.