Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35899043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Hospital Urinary Tract Infections in Healthcare Units on the Example of Mazovian Specialist Hospital Ltd.

Zuzanna Trześniewska-Ofiara, Mariola Mendrycka, Andrzej Cudo, Magdalena Szmulik, Agnieszka Woźniak-Kosek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rising Prevalence of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Trends in Antibiotic Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antibiotic Resistance of UropathogenicIranian journal of public health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High prevalence of fluconazole resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zuzanna Trześniewska-OfiaraDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, Mazovian Specialist Hospital Ltd, Radom, Poland.
Mariola MendryckaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities, Radom, Poland.
Andrzej CudoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Magdalena SzmulikSysmex Poland Ltd, scientific aspect prepared in cooperation with Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka Woźniak-KosekDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin · PLKazimierz Pułaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom · PLRadom College · PLWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiological diagnostics is of great importance in limiting the spread of nosocomial infections. The information on etiological agents of infections and their susceptibility to antibiotics enables a quick response in the case of a suspected epidemic outbreak. The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence of nosocomial urinary tract infections among patients hospitalized in hospital wards over a period of 2 years and to determine the predominant etiological agent depending on the method of clinical specimen collection. Data from the Mazovian Specialist Hospital (MSH) in Radom constitute the material for the preparation of this study. Urine was collected using two methods. The first one was the method of collecting urine from the central stream, while the second method was urine collected from patients with a urinary catheter in place. The statistical calculations were conducted using the statistical software. Based on hospital data, it was shown that 5,870 urine tests were performed during the period under review, of which 2,070 were positive. The number of positive results in 2021 decreased by 2.84% compared to that in 2020. On the basis of the statistical analysis, differences in the occurrence of multiple strains were observed between catheter-based and midstream urine collection. Differences were observed especially for

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiCross InfectionUrinary Tract InfectionsDelivery of Health CareEscherichia coliHospitalsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaePseudomonas aeruginosamicrobiological diagnosticsnosocomial urinary tract infectionsurinary tract infectionsurine culturesuropathogenic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID35899043
PMCPMC9309389
OpenAlexW4285010141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.