Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Temperature and Impedance Variations During Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Treatment.

Nichal Gentilal, Eyal Abend, Ariel Naveh, Tal Marciano, Igal Balin, Yevgeniy Telepinsky, Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [A simulation study of photothermal effects in transcranial photobiomodulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nichal GentilalInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal.
Eyal AbendNovocure Ltd, Haifa, Israel.
Ariel NavehNovocure Ltd, Haifa, Israel.
Tal MarcianoNovocure Ltd, Haifa, Israel.
Igal BalinNovocure Ltd, Haifa, Israel.
Yevgeniy TelepinskyNovocure Ltd, Haifa, Israel.
Pedro Cavaleiro MirandaInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) is an FDA-approved cancer treatment technique used for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). It consists in the application of alternating (100-500 kHz) and low-intensity (1-3 V/cm) electric fields (EFs) to interfere with the mitotic process of tumoral cells. In patients, these fields are applied via transducer arrays strategically positioned on the scalp using the NovoTAL™ system. It is recommended that the patient stays under the application of these fields for as long as possible. Inevitably, the temperature of the scalp increases because of the Joule effect, and it will remain above basal values for most part of the day. Furthermore, it is also known that the impedance of the head changes throughout treatment and that it might also play a role in the temperature variations. The goals of this work were to investigate how to realistically account for these increases and to quantify their impact in the choice of optimal arrays positions using a realistic head model with arrays positions obtained through NovoTAL™. We also studied the impedance variations based on the log files of patients who participated in the EF-14 clinical trial. Our computational results indicated that the layouts in which the arrays were very close to each other led to the appearance of a temperature hotspot that limited how much current could be injected which could consequently reduce treatment efficacy. Based on these data, we suggest that the arrays should be placed at least 1 cm apart from each other. The analysis of the impedance showed that the variations seen during treatment could be explained by three main factors: slow and long-term variations, array placement, and circadian rhythm. Our work indicates that both the temperature and impedance variations should be accounted for to improve the accuracy of computational results when investigating TTFields.

Indexed as

finite element method (FEM)glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)head impedanceNovoTAL systemrealistic head modeltissue heatingTumor Treating Fields (TTFields)

Identifiers

PMID35898934
PMCPMC9310567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.