Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898921›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2022

Risk assessment in systemic lupus erythematosus-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: CSTAR-PAH cohort study.

Qian Wang, Junyan Qian, Mengtao Li, Xiao Zhang, Wei Wei, Xiaoxia Zuo, Ping Zhu, Shuang Ye, Wei Zhang, Yi Zheng and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Qian WangDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-9898
Junyan QianDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6909-539X
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-2889
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Rheumatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxia ZuoDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ping ZhuDepartment of Clinical Immunology, PLA Specialized Research Institute of Rheumatology & Immunology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Shuang YeDepartment of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital South Campus, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yi ZhengDepartment of Rheumatology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wufang QiDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yang LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Zhuoli ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feng DingDepartment of Rheumatology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jieruo GuDepartment of Rheumatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Can HuangDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiuliang ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-2858
Yongtai LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhuang TianDepartment of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanhong WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, China Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Miaojia ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Xiaofeng ZengDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Ave, Beijing 100730, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-2318
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNCapital Medical University · CNCentral South University · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNPeking University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTianjin First Center Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the prognostic value of the multivariable risk assessment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort of SLE-associated PAH (CSTAR-PAH cohort) diagnosed based on right heart catheterization (RHC) was established. Baseline and follow-up records were collected. Three methods of risk assessment, including (1) the number of low-risk criteria, based on World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), right atrial pressure (RAP), and cardiac index (CI); (2) the three-strata stratification based on the average risk score of four variables (WHO FC, 6MWD, RAP, and CI); and (3) the four-strata stratification based on COMPARE 2.0 model were applied. A risk-assessment method using three noninvasive low-risk criteria was applied at the first follow-up visit. Survival curves between patients with different risk groups were compared by Kaplan-Meier's estimation and log-rank test. Results: Three-hundred and ten patients were enrolled from 14 PAH centers. All methods of stratification at baseline and first follow-up significantly discriminated long-term survival. Survival rates were also significantly different based on the noninvasive risk assessment in first follow-up visit. Survival deteriorated with the escalation of risk from baseline to first follow-up. Patients with baseline serositis had a higher rate of risk improvement in their follow-up. Conclusion: The risk assessment has a significant prognostic value at both the baseline and first follow-up assessment of SLE-associated PAH. A noninvasive risk assessment can also be useful when RHC is not available during follow-up. Baseline serositis may be a predictor of good treatment response in patients with SLE-associated PAH.

Indexed as

prognosispulmonary arterial hypertensionrisk assessmentrisk stratificationsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID35898921
PMCPMC9310292
OpenAlexW4286540095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.