Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Application of Convolution Neural Network Algorithm Based on Multicenter ABUS Images in Breast Lesion Detection.

Jianxing Zhang, Xing Tao, Yanhui Jiang, Xiaoxi Wu, Dan Yan, Wen Xue, Shulian Zhuang, Ling Chen, Liangping Luo, Dong Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianxing ZhangDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xing TaoMedical Ultrasound Image Computing Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yanhui JiangMedical Ultrasound Image Computing Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoxi WuDepartment of Ultrasound, Remote Consultation Center of ABUS, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Dan YanDepartment of Ultrasound, Remote Consultation Center of ABUS, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wen XueDepartment of Ultrasound, Remote Consultation Center of ABUS, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shulian ZhuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Remote Consultation Center of ABUS, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Remote Consultation Center of ABUS, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Liangping LuoDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Dong NiMedical Ultrasound Image Computing Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a convolution neural network algorithm for breast lesion detection with multi-center ABUS image data developed based on ABUS image and Yolo v5. Methods: A total of 741 cases with 2,538 volume data of ABUS examinations were analyzed, which were recruited from 7 hospitals between October 2016 and December 2020. A total of 452 volume data of 413 cases were used as internal validation data, and 2,086 volume data from 328 cases were used as external validation data. There were 1,178 breast lesions in 413 patients (161 malignant and 1,017 benign) and 1,936 lesions in 328 patients (57 malignant and 1,879 benign). The efficiency and accuracy of the algorithm were analyzed in detecting lesions with different allowable false positive values and lesion sizes, and the differences were compared and analyzed, which included the various indicators in internal validation and external validation data. Results: The study found that the algorithm had high sensitivity for all categories of lesions, even when using internal or external validation data. The overall detection rate of the algorithm was as high as 78.1 and 71.2% in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The algorithm could detect more lesions with increasing nodule size (87.4% in ≥10 mm lesions but less than 50% in <10 mm). The detection rate of BI-RADS 4/5 lesions was higher than that of BI-RADS 3 or 2 (96.5% vs 79.7% vs 74.7% internal, 95.8% vs 74.7% vs 88.4% external). Furthermore, the detection performance was better for malignant nodules than benign (98.1% vs 74.9% internal, 98.2% vs 70.4% external). Conclusions: This algorithm showed good detection efficiency in the internal and external validation sets, especially for category 4/5 lesions and malignant lesions. However, there are still some deficiencies in detecting category 2 and 3 lesions and lesions smaller than 10 mm.

Indexed as

automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS)breast cancerconvolution neural networkdetectionvalidation data

Identifiers

PMID35898876
PMCPMC9310547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.