Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898852›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare informatics research2022

Active Learning for Multi-way Sensitivity Analysis with Application to Disease Screening Modeling.

Mucahit Cevik, Sabrina Angco, Elham Heydarigharaei, Hadi Jahanshahi, Nicholas Prayogo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mucahit CevikToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4020-6305
Sabrina AngcoToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Elham HeydarigharaeiToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Hadi JahanshahiToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.
Nicholas PrayogoToronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard St E, Toronto, M5B 1G3 Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is an important aspect of model development as it can be used to assess the level of confidence that is associated with the outcomes of a study. In many practical problems, sensitivity analysis involves evaluating a large number of parameter combinations which may require an extensive amount of time and resources. However, such a computational burden can be avoided by identifying smaller subsets of parameter combinations that can be later used to generate the desired outcomes for other parameter combinations. In this study, we investigate machine learning-based approaches for speeding up the sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, we apply feature selection methods to identify the relative importance of quantitative model parameters in terms of their predictive ability on the outcomes. Finally, we highlight the effectiveness of active learning strategies in improving the sensitivity analysis processes by reducing the total number of quantitative model runs required to construct a high-performance prediction model. Our experiments on two datasets obtained from the sensitivity analysis performed for two disease screening modeling studies indicate that ensemble methods such as Random Forests and XGBoost consistently outperform other machine learning algorithms in the prediction task of the associated sensitivity analysis. In addition, we note that active learning can lead to significant speed-ups in sensitivity analysis by enabling the selection of more useful parameter combinations (i.e., instances) to be used for prediction models.

Indexed as

Active learningDisease screeningMachine learningRegressionSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35898852
PMCPMC9309115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.