ArticleDEN open2023
Comparison of Fork-tip and Franseen needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions: A propensity-matched analysis.
Article in DEN open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06298604 (Comparison Between a Novel Motorized EUS Guided Fine Needle Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between a Novel Motorized EUS Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) With Standard Needle for Pancreatic and Liver Biopsies
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Franseen Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Sampling Techniques for Pancreatic and Pulmonary Nodules: A Review of the Evolution of Guidance and Sampling Methods.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Review
- Novel use of superb microvascular imaging in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for pancreatic mass.Endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: There is no unanimity regarding the most appropriate needle to use for an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). To date, new types of FNB needles have been designed, including the Fork-tip and Franseen needles. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality between the use of the Franseen and Fork-tip needles in EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic lesions. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients at our center for solid pancreatic lesions, 75 of whom underwent EUS-FNB using a 22-G Franseen needle, and 72 using a 22-G Fork-tip needle, from December 2019 to September 2021. The present study conducted a propensity-matched analysis and confounder adjustment. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the Fork-tip group (93.3%, 42/45) was the same as that of the Franseen group. For the core tissue and blood scores, no significant difference was observed ( Conclusions: In both groups, the diagnostic accuracy and histological quality were not significantly different. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the rate of operator changes. As both needles are useful, the choice of using either of them is equally good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.