Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898593›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2022

Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer. 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Gábor Rubovszky, Judit Kocsis, Katalin Boér, Nataliya Chilingirova, Magdolna Dank, Zsuzsanna Kahán, Dilyara Kaidarova, Erika Kövér, Bibiana Vertáková Krakovská, Károly Máhr and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gábor RubovszkyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Chest and Abdominal Tumours Chemotherapy "B", Budapest, Hungary.
Judit KocsisCenter of Oncoradiology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Katalin BoérDepartment of Oncology, Szent Margit Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Nataliya ChilingirovaClinic Center of Excellence, Heart and Brain Hospital, Science and Research Institute, Medical University-Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria.
Magdolna DankOncology Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna KahánOncotherapy Clinic, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Dilyara KaidarovaKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Erika KövérInstitute of Oncotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Bibiana Vertáková Krakovská1st Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Károly MáhrDepartment of Oncology, Szent Rafael Hospital of Zala County, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary.
Bela Mriňáková1st Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Béla PikóCounty Oncology Centre, Pándy Kálmán Hospital of Békés County Council, Gyula, Hungary.
Ivana Božović-SpasojevićInstitute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Daily Chemotherapy Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia.
Zsolt HorváthCenter of Oncoradiology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified based on the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The professional guideline primarily reflects the resolutions and recommendations of the current ESMO, NCCN and ABC5, as well as that of the St. Gallen Consensus Conference statements. The recommendations cover classical prognostic factors and certain multigene tests, which play an important role in therapeutic decision-making. From a didactic point of view, the text first addresses early and then locally advanced breast cancer, followed by locoregionally recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Within these, we discuss each group according to the available therapeutic options. At the end of the recommendations, we summarize the criteria for treatment in certain rare clinical situations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMedical Oncologyadjuvant treatmentearly breast cancerguidelineinflammatory breast cancerlocally advanced breast cancermetastatic breast cancerneoadjuvant treatment

Identifiers

PMID35898593
PMCPMC9311257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.