ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abnormal metal ion levels following spinal instrumentation surgery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Bibliometric study on the utilization of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging can Differentiate between Residual or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Inflammatory Reaction Zone: A Single-Center Study.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors for early mortality following hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Microwave ablation followed by cTACE in 5-cm HCC lesions: does a single-session approach affect liver function?La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for recurrent liver cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Chemoembolization Plus Ablation: Current Status.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although many studies reported the effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or surgical resection (SR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the efficacy of these two strategies remains controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of sequential use of TACE plus RFA (TACE + RFA) and SR alone in treating HCC. Methods: Relevant studies with unmatched and propensity score-matched patients were identified by comprehensive search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) software version 5.4.1. Finally, 12 eligible studies were included in this study, including 11 case-control studies and 1 randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of interest for this study was to compare the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), major complications, 5-year OS in different tumor diameters between the two treatment strategies, and hospital stay time. Results: HCC patients who received TACE + RFA had a lower incidence of complication rates and shorter hospital stay time than those who received SR alone. Among these studies using propensity score-matched cohorts, SR had better 3- and 5-year OS than TACE + RFA, whereas there were no significant differences between TACE + RFA and SR regarding the 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS. When the tumor diameter is longer than 3 cm, the 5-year OS rate is better when SR is selected. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the short-term survival outcomes between TACE + RFA and SR in HCC patients. Moreover, SR is superior to TACE + RFA in terms of long-term beneficial effects but may result in a higher risk of major complications and a longer hospital stay time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.