ArticleMetabolism open2022
Sex differences in the acute effect of stair-climbing on postprandial blood glucose levels: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Metabolism open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- One minute of light-intensity stair-stepping decreases postprandial glycaemia in the evening in non-diabetic adults: A randomized controlled trial.Experimental physiology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Noninvasive Detection of Acute Hyperglycemia Using Signal from Wearable ECG Sensors Considering Individual HRV Response Delays to Glucose.Biosensors · 2026Article
- One minute of stair climbing and descending reduces postprandial insulin and glucose with 3-min improving insulin resistance following a mixed meal in young adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single, short stair climbing and descending (SCD) bouts of low to moderate intensity effectively lower postprandial blood glucose but previous reports have found conflicting results on interactions by sex during exercise. We hypothesize that SCD at a self-selected intensity will be equally effective at lowering postprandial blood glucose in males and females. Methods and Results: Thirty subjects (age: 23.8 (3.0) years) performed 0, 1, 3, and 10 min of SCD following consumption of a mixed meal. SCD was performed at a self-selected comfortable pace and all bouts ended at minute 28. Postprandial blood glucose was measured every 15 min for 1 h and analyzed as glucose over time, area under the curve (AUC), and incremental AUC (iAUC) using mixed-design ANOVAs with repeated measures. Although there was no interaction between sex and condition or time (p = .129 to .541) for glucose over time, AUC, or iAUC, there was a main effect for sex for glucose over time (p = .004) and AUC (p = .006), but not iAUC (p = .125). Females had higher blood glucose throughout each trial (22% (13 to 31%), p = .004) but both males' and females' postprandial blood glucose was lowered following 10 min of SCD relative to the seated control condition. Conclusions: Males and females benefited equally from single, short SCD bouts of low to moderate intensity despite females having higher blood glucose at all time points. Previous findings of sex differences in the attenuating effect of exercise on postprandial blood glucose are likely due to the use of absolute workloads leading to varying relative intensities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.