SynthesisComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
A Net Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Dressings in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot.
Synthesis in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of mesenchymal stem cells in treating diabetic skin ulcers in animal models.International wound journal · 2024Review
- Article
- Efficacy of 15% lysine cream in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized interventional study.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2023Article
- Retracted: A Net Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Different Types of Dressings in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/1551C1DB36E740B3FC274AFF190571
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This is an analysis of the impact of a new dressing commonly used to treat diabetic foot (DFU). Methods: Chinese and English databases were searched to collect clinical randomized controlled studies (RCTs) of various types of dressings for the treatment of DFU, and the healing rates of the different dressings were combined by reticulation meta-analysis. Results: The aggregate of the 36 RCTs included in this study analysed the healing rates of nine dressings: conventional dressing, alginate dressing, chitosan dressing, hyaluronic acid dressing, platelet-rich plasma dressing, amniotic membrane dressing, honey dressing, human recombinant growth factor dressing, and silver ionomer dressing. Conclusion: Hyaluronic acid dressing, amniotic membrane dressing, honey dressing, and platelet-rich plasma dressing are the ideal materials for topical treatment of DFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.