Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898300›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022

Revising Vital Signs Criteria for Accurate Triage of Older Adults in the Emergency Department.

Yi-Chia Su, Cheng-Yu Chien, Chung-Hsien Chaou, Kuang-Hung Hsu, Shi-Ying Gao, Chip-Jin Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi-Chia SuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yu ChienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9538-6265
Chung-Hsien ChaouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3702-7499
Kuang-Hung HsuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2642-7689
Shi-Ying GaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chip-Jin NgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0363-2938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Because of physiologic changes in older adults, their vital signs need to be assessed differently. This study aimed to determine appropriate vital sign cut points for triage designation in older patients presented to the emergency department (ED). Patients and Methods: Data from 78,524 ED visits of patients aged ≥65 years in Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (LCGMH) between 2016 and 2017 were collected. New cut points for vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], heart rate [HR], body temperature [BT], and Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) were determined using the critical event rate (the composite of admission to ICU and mortality in hospital) for each vital sign. The newly proposed triage scale was then validated using two other databases (Chang Gung Research Database [CGRD] and Taipei City Hospital [TPECH] database). The Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale (TTAS) was used in this study. Results: In the LCGMH derivation group, older patients presenting with SBP < 80 mmHg, HR < 40 or > 140 beats per minute (bpm), BT < 35°C, and GCS score 3-8 had a critical event rate of >20% and were proposed to be uptriaged to TTAS level 1. Following a reclassification, a portion of older patients are uptriaged by the newly proposed TTAS, and increase in the critical event rate in TTAS level 1 and level 2 groups compared to the existing TTAS. The newly proposed TTAS exhibited comparable discriminatory ability for triage in older patients compared to the existing TTAS (the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: CGRD, 0.76 vs 0.62; TPECH, 0.71 vs 0.59). Conclusion: Revising the vital signs triage criteria for older patients could be a way to improve the identification of patients with critical event outcomes in high TTAS level, thereby improving triage accuracy among older patients visiting the ED.

Indexed as

decision-makingemergency departmentolder patientstriagevital signs

Identifiers

PMID35898300
PMCPMC9309291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.