Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898288›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Predicting death risk analysis in fully vaccinated people using novel extreme regression-voting classifier.

Eysha Saad, Saima Sadiq, Ramish Jamil, Furqan Rustam, Arif Mehmood, Gyu Sang Choi, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eysha SaadDepartment of Computer Science, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Saima SadiqDepartment of Computer Science, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Ramish JamilDepartment of Computer Science, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Furqan RustamDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Arif MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science & Information Technology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Gyu Sang ChoiDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-6496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination for the COVID-19 pandemic has raised serious concerns among the public and various rumours are spread regarding the resulting illness, adverse reactions, and death. Such rumours can damage the campaign against the COVID-19 and should be dealt with accordingly. One prospective solution is to use machine learning-based models to predict the death risk for vaccinated people by utilizing the available data. This study focuses on the prognosis of three significant events including 'not survived', 'recovered', and 'not recovered' based on the adverse events followed by the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Extensive experiments are performed to analyse the efficacy of the proposed Extreme Regression- Voting Classifier model in comparison with machine learning models with Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency, Bag of Words, and Global Vectors, and deep learning models like Convolutional Neural Network, Long Short Term Memory, and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory. Experiments are carried out on the original, as well as, a balanced dataset using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Approach. Results reveal that the proposed voting classifier in combination with TF-IDF outperforms with a 0.85 accuracy score on the SMOTE-balanced dataset. In line with this, the validation of the proposed voting classifier on binary classification shows state-of-the-art results with a 0.98 accuracy.

Indexed as

adverse reactionsCOVID-19machine learningpost-vaccination symptoms

Identifiers

PMID35898288
PMCPMC9309760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.