Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Germplasm Sources, Genetic Richness, and Population Differentiation of Modern Chinese Soybean Cultivars Based on Pedigree Integrated With Genomic-Marker Analysis.

Chunyan Li, Wubin Wang, Yongpeng Pan, Fangdong Liu, Jianbo He, Chuanxiang Liu, Jiqiu Cao, Xiaoyan Zhang, Jinming Zhao, Junyi Gai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chunyan LiSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Wubin WangSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Yongpeng PanSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Fangdong LiuSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Jianbo HeSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Chuanxiang LiuMARA Key Laboratory of Germplasm Enhancement and Breeding Technology of Soybean, Jiaxiang, China.
Jiqiu CaoMARA Key Laboratory of Germplasm Enhancement and Breeding Technology of Soybean, Jiaxiang, China.
Xiaoyan ZhangMARA Key Laboratory of Germplasm Enhancement and Breeding Technology of Soybean, Jiaxiang, China.
Jinming ZhaoSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Junyi GaiSoybean Research Institute & MARA National Center for Soybean Improvement & MARA Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General) & State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement & Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean is a native crop in China for ≈ 5,000 years. The 560 cultivars released in 2006-2015, commercialized with seeds available publicly, were collected (designated modern Chinese soybean cultivars, MCSCs), as a part of 2,371 ones released during ~100 years' breeding history. The MCSCs with their parental pedigrees were gathered, including 279, 155, and 126 cultivars from Northeast and Northwest China (NNC), Huang-Huai-Hai Valleys (HHH), and Southern China (SC), respectively. The MCSCs were tested in the field, genotyped with sequencing, and analyzed for their germplasm sources, genetic richness, and population differentiation based on pedigree integrated with genomic-marker analysis. The main results were as follows: (i) The MCSCs covering 12 of the global 13 MGs (maturity groups) showing different ecoregions with different cropping systems caused their different MG constitutions. (ii) Parental pedigree analysis showed 718 immediate parents and 604 terminal ancestors involved in MCSCs, from which 41 core-terminal ancestors were identified. (iii) NNC was richer in allele number and specific present/deficient alleles, and genetically distant from HHH and SC. (iv) The geographic grouping of MCSCs was partially consistent with marker-based clustering, indicating multiple genetic backgrounds in three eco-subpopulations. (v) Eleven major core-terminal ancestor-derived families were identified, including four derived from ancestors in NNC, four from HHH, and three from SC, containing 463 (82.68%) MCSCs with some cross-distribution among ecoregions. (vi) CGS (coefficient of genetic similarity) calculated from genomic markers showed more precision than COP (coefficient of parentage) using pedigree information in evaluating genetic relationship/differentiation. Overall, through pedigree and genomic-marker analyses, the germplasm constitutions of the three eco-subpopulations were relatively self-sufficient, and germplasm exchange is seriously required for further improvement.

Indexed as

coefficient of genetic similarity (CGS)coefficient of parentage (COP)core-terminal ancestorgermplasmmodern Chinese soybean cultivar population (MCSCs/MCSCP)pedigreepopulation differentiation

Identifiers

PMID35898228
PMCPMC9309878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.