Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898197›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2022

The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives.

Nienke van de Kruis, Phyllis van der Ploeg, Jody H C Wilting, M Caroline Vos, Anna M J Thijs, Joanne de Hullu, Petronella B Ottevanger, Christianne Lok, Jurgen M J Piek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nienke van de KruisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Phyllis van der PloegDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jody H C WiltingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M Caroline VosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Anna M J ThijsDepartment of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Joanne de HulluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Petronella B OttevangerMedical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christianne LokDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jurgen M J PiekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Clinical efficacy of cytostatic anticancer agents can be determined with the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio. This outcome measure compares PFS achieved by a new treatment (PFS2) to the PFS of the most recent treatment on which the patient has experienced progression (PFS1). Clinical benefit has been defined as a PFS-ratio (PFS2/PFS1) > 1.3. However, in order to demonstrate significant benefit, trial designs require an assumption on the proportion of patients who reach this ratio during palliative options. For ovarian carcinoma, data is lacking to support this assumption. Therefore in this study, we assess the PFS-ratio in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients treated with current palliative options. Methods: We included 67 patients with recurrent high-grade serous (HGSC, 73.1%) or low-grade (LGOC, 26.9%) ovarian carcinoma. We determined the median PFS-ratio and investigated the association with clinicopathological characteristics. Results: Overall, we observed a median PFS-ratio of 0.69. The proportion of patients with a PFS-ratio > 1.3 was 22.4%. For HGSC patients, the median PFS-ratio was significantly lower than for LGOC patients (respectively, 0.58 and 1.26, Conclusions: Although the PFS-ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure in studies investigating cytostatic anticancer agents, we conclude that it is influenced by tumor histology and biological behavior. In future research, these factors should be taken into account when determining thresholds for clinical benefit in trial designs.

Indexed as

Growth-modulation indexOvarian cancerOvarian carcinomaProgression-free survival ratioTime to progression ratio

Identifiers

PMID35898197
PMCPMC9309411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.