Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898173›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey.

Georgia Tobiano, Andrea P Marshall, Therese Gardiner, Kim Jenkinson, Margaret Shapiro, Michael Ireland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia TobianoGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5437-0777
Andrea P MarshallGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Therese GardinerGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Kim JenkinsonGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Margaret ShapiroGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Michael IrelandSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Gold Coast Health · AUGriffith University · AUUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhen handover is conducted at the patient's bedside, active patient participation can be encouraged, which may improve the safety and quality of care. There is a need for valid and reliable tools to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, to ensure the rising number of implementation and improvement efforts are consistently and effectively evaluated. The aim of this study is to systematically develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a self-report survey to measure patients' perceptions of participation in bedside handover.

methodsIn Phase 1, our team developed a conceptual framework and item pool (n = 130). In Phase 2, content validity was assessed with four health consumers, four nurses and four researchers. Next, 10 current hospital inpatients tested the survey for end-user satisfaction. In Phase 3, 326 inpatients completed the survey, allowing exploratory factor analysis, reliability analyses and convergent/divergent validity analyses to occur.

resultsPhase 1 and 2 resulted in a 42-item survey. In Phase 3, 321 surveys were available for analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution, with 24 items, which matched our conceptual framework. The three factors were: 'Conditions for patient participation in bedside handover', 'Level of patient participation in bedside handover' and 'Evaluation of patient participation in bedside handover'. There was strong evidence for factor reliability and validity. Additionally, the correlation between factors was strong.

conclusionThis study furthers our conceptual understanding by showing that nurse facilitating behaviours are a strong precursor for patient participation and perceived handover outcomes, justifying the need for nursing training. A robust survey has been developed to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, which can effectively evaluate this approach to care. Engaging consumers and nurses as research team members was invaluable in ensuring that the survey is acceptable for end-users. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A health consumer and nurse partnered as members of the research team from study inception to dissemination.

Indexed as

Patient HandoffPatient ParticipationHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbedside handovernurse-patient relationspatient-centred carepatient handoffpatient participationpsychometricssurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35898173
PMCPMC9615084
OpenAlexW4288074863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.