Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898170›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Goal directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in intensive care patients with fluid overload: A trial protocol for a randomised, blinded trial (GODIF trial).

Sine Wichmann, Theis S Itenov, Rasmus E Berthelsen, Theis Lange, Anders Perner, Christian Gluud, Pia Lawson-Smith, Lars Nebrich, Jørgen Wiis, Anne C Brøchner and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04180397 (Goal Directed Fluid Removal With Furosemide in Intensive Care Patients With Fluid Overload - A Randomised, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04180397 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Goal Directed Fluid Removal With Furosemide in Intensive Care Patients With Fluid Overload - A Randomised, Blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial (GODIF).

TypeinterventionalSponsorMorten H. BestleRan2020 to 2028Enrolled1,000ConditionsFluid OverloadArmsFurosemide, Isotonic saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 17 institutions in 8 countries.

Sine WichmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-8655
Theis S ItenovDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Rasmus E BerthelsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-0944
Theis LangeSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pia Lawson-SmithDepartment of Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lars NebrichDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.
Jørgen WiisDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne C BrøchnerDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
Thomas HildebrandtDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Meike T BehzadiDepartment of Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kristian StrandDepartment of Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Finn H AndersenDepartment of Intensive Care, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Thomas StrømDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Mikko JärvisaloPerioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Kjeld A J DamgaardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Regions Hospital Nordjylland, Hjørring, Denmark.
Marianne L VangDepartment of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Rebecka R WahlinDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin I SigurdssonDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Katrin M ThormarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Marlies OstermannDepartment of Intensive Care, King's College London, Guy's & St. Thomas' Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Frederik KeusDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Morten H BestleDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKReykjavík University · ISUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKKing's College London · GBKolding Hospital · DKNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOOdense University Hospital · DKRegionshospital Nordjylland · DKStavanger University Hospital · NOStockholm South General Hospital · SESygehus Sønderjylland · DKTurku University Hospital · FIUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid overload is a risk factor for mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Administration of loop diuretics is the predominant treatment of fluid overload, but evidence for its benefit is very uncertain when assessed in a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. The GODIF trial will assess the benefits and harms of goal directed fluid removal with furosemide versus placebo in ICU patients with fluid overload.

methodsAn investigator-initiated, international, randomised, stratified, blinded, parallel-group trial allocating 1000 adult ICU patients with fluid overload to infusion of furosemide versus placebo. The goal is to achieve a neutral fluid balance. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital 90 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at day 90 and 1-year after randomisation; days alive at day 90 without life support; number of participants with one or more serious adverse events or reactions; health-related quality of life and cognitive function at 1-year follow-up. A sample size of 1000 participants is required to detect an improvement of 8% in days alive and out of hospital 90 days after randomisation with a power of 90% and a risk of type 1 error of 5%. The conclusion of the trial will be based on the point estimate and 95% confidence interval; dichotomisation will not be used. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04180397. PERSPECTIVE: The GODIF trial will provide important evidence of possible benefits and harms of fluid removal with furosemide in adult ICU patients with fluid overload.

Indexed as

FurosemideWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceAdultCritical CareGoalsHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeFurosemideSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitorscritical carede-resuscitationdiureticsfluid accumulationfluid overloadfluid removalfurosemideintensive careloop diureticsprotocolrandomised clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID35898170
PMCPMC9541596
OpenAlexW4288074782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.