ReviewClinical endoscopy2022
Endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical significance and application in practice.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construct Validity of the Toronto IBD Global Endoscopic Reporting Score Compared to Inflammatory Biomarkers After 12-Month Follow-Up.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Development & validation of a format for reporting endoscopic colonic biopsies.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Laboratory Tests in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach to Daily Practice.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Combining mechanistic modeling with machine learning as a strategy to predict inflammatory bowel disease clinical scores.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The gut microbiota and its metabolites: novel therapeutic targets for inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 Is a Novel Faecal Biomarker for Monitoring Disease Activity and Therapeutic Response in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Article
- Crohn's disease management: translating STRIDE-II for UK clinical practice.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Diagnostic Tools in the Assessment of Histological Healing.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Use of Standardized Inflammatory Bowel Disease Endoscopy Scores in Clinical Practice.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopy is vital for diagnosing, assessing treatment response, and monitoring surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). With the growing importance of mucosal healing as a treatment target, the assessment of disease activity by endoscopy has been accepted as the standard of care for IBD. There are many endoscopic activity indices for facilitating standardized reporting of the gastrointestinal mucosal appearance in IBD, and each index has its strengths and weaknesses. Although most endoscopic indices do not have a clear-cut validated definition, endoscopic remission or mucosal healing is associated with favorable outcomes, such as a decreased risk of relapse. Therefore, experts suggest utilizing endoscopic indices for monitoring disease activity and optimizing treatment to achieve remission. However, the regular monitoring of endoscopic activity is limited in practice owing to several factors, such as the complexity of the procedure, time consumption, inter-observer variability, and lack of a clear-cut, validated definition of endoscopic response or remission. Although experts have recently suggested consensus-based definitions, further studies are needed to define the values that can predict long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.