Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898098›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Study on the Geometric and Kinematic Descriptors of Trajectories in the Classification of Ship Types.

Yashar Tavakoli, Lourdes Peña-Castillo, Amilcar Soares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yashar TavakoliDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0854-1261
Lourdes Peña-CastilloDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0643-2547
Amilcar SoaresDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5957-3805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of ships based on their trajectory descriptors is a common practice that is helpful in various contexts, such as maritime security and traffic management. For the most part, the descriptors are either geometric, which capture the shape of a ship's trajectory, or kinematic, which capture the motion properties of a ship's movement. Understanding the implications of the type of descriptor that is used in classification is important for feature engineering and model interpretation. However, this matter has not yet been deeply studied. This article contributes to feature engineering within this field by introducing proper similarity measures between the descriptors and defining sound benchmark classifiers, based on which we compared the predictive performance of geometric and kinematic descriptors. The performance profiles of geometric and kinematic descriptors, along with several standard tools in interpretable machine learning, helped us to provide an account of how different ships differ in movement. Our results indicated that the predictive performance of geometric and kinematic descriptors varied greatly, depending on the classification problem at hand. We also showed that the movement of certain ship classes solely differed geometrically while some other classes differed kinematically and that this difference could be formulated in simple terms. On the other hand, the movement characteristics of some other ship classes could not be delineated along these lines and were more complicated to express. Finally, this study verified the conjecture that the geometric-kinematic taxonomy could be further developed as a tool for more accessible feature selection.

Indexed as

ShipsBiomechanical PhenomenaMotionclassificationdescriptorfeature engineeringfeature selectionknowledge discoverymodel interpretationshiptrajectory

Identifiers

PMID35898098
PMCPMC9329964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.