Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898085›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Generic Chemometric Models for Metabolite Concentration Prediction Based on Raman Spectra.

Abdolrahim Yousefi-Darani, Olivier Paquet-Durand, Almut Von Wrochem, Jens Classen, Jens Tränkle, Mario Mertens, Jeroen Snelders, Veronique Chotteau, Meeri Mäkinen, Alina Handl and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Monitoring and modelling the glutamine metabolic pathway: a review and future perspectives.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Abdolrahim Yousefi-DaraniDepartment of Process Analytics und Cereal Science, Institute for Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Olivier Paquet-DurandDepartment of Process Analytics und Cereal Science, Institute for Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-1988
Almut Von WrochemDepartment of Process Analytics und Cereal Science, Institute for Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Jens ClassenBayer AG, L Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 1, 51373 Leverkusen, Germany.
Jens TränkleBayer AG, L Kaiser-Wilhelm-Allee 1, 51373 Leverkusen, Germany.
Mario MertensSanofi, Cipalstraat 8, 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Jeroen SneldersSanofi, Cipalstraat 8, 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Veronique ChotteauDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 109 06 Stockholm, Sweden.
Meeri MäkinenDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 109 06 Stockholm, Sweden.
Alina HandlRentschler Biopharma SE, Erwin-Rentschler-Street 21, 88471 Laupheim, Germany.
Marvin KadischRentschler Biopharma SE, Erwin-Rentschler-Street 21, 88471 Laupheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8513-7820
Dietmar LangRentschler Biopharma SE, Erwin-Rentschler-Street 21, 88471 Laupheim, Germany.
Patrick DumasGSK, Rue de l'Institut 89, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium.
Bernd HitzmannDepartment of Process Analytics und Cereal Science, Institute for Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-7977
University of Hohenheim · DERentschler Biopharma (Germany) · DEBayer (Germany) · DEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SESanofi (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Inovative Medicines Initiative 777397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemometric models for on-line process monitoring have become well established in pharmaceutical bioprocesses. The main drawback is the required calibration effort and the inflexibility regarding system or process changes. So, a recalibration is necessary whenever the process or the setup changes even slightly. With a large and diverse Raman dataset, however, it was possible to generate generic partial least squares regression models to reliably predict the concentrations of important metabolic compounds, such as glucose-, lactate-, and glutamine-indifferent CHO cell cultivations. The data for calibration were collected from various cell cultures from different sites in different companies using different Raman spectrophotometers. In testing, the developed “generic” models were capable of predicting the concentrations of said compounds from a dilution series in FMX-8 mod medium, as well as from an independent CHO cell culture. These spectra were taken with a completely different setup and with different Raman spectrometers, demonstrating the model flexibility. The prediction errors for the tests were mostly in an acceptable range (<10% relative error). This demonstrates that, under the right circumstances and by choosing the calibration data carefully, it is possible to create generic and reliable chemometric models that are transferrable from one process to another without recalibration.

Indexed as

ChemometricsSpectrum Analysis, RamanAnimalsCalibrationCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusLeast-Squares AnalysischemometricsCHO cell cultivationgeneric modelon-line process monitoringPLS regressionRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35898085
PMCPMC9332195
OpenAlexW4288053292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.