Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35898063›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Software-Defined Networking: Categories, Analysis, and Future Directions.

Mudassar Hussain, Nadir Shah, Rashid Amin, Sultan S Alshamrani, Aziz Alotaibi, Syed Mohsan Raza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mudassar HussainDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wah, Wah Cantt P.O. Box 47010, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2723-2253
Nadir ShahDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt P.O. Box 47010, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1173-4272
Rashid AminDepartment of Computer Science, University of Chakwal, Chakwal P.O. Box 48800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-689X
Sultan S AlshamraniDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif P.O. Box 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-9354
Aziz AlotaibiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif P.O. Box 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-6716
Syed Mohsan RazaDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus, Wah Cantt P.O. Box 47010, Pakistan.
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKTaif University · SAUniversity of Wah · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Software-defined networking (SDN) is an innovative network architecture that splits the control and management planes from the data plane. It helps in simplifying network manageability and programmability, along with several other benefits. Due to the programmability features, SDN is gaining popularity in both academia and industry. However, this emerging paradigm has been facing diverse kinds of challenges during the SDN implementation process and with respect to adoption of existing technologies. This paper evaluates several existing approaches in SDN and compares and analyzes the findings. The paper is organized into seven categories, namely network testing and verification, flow rule installation mechanisms, network security and management issues related to SDN implementation, memory management studies, SDN simulators and emulators, SDN programming languages, and SDN controller platforms. Each category has significance in the implementation of SDN networks. During the implementation process, network testing and verification is very important to avoid packet violations and network inefficiencies. Similarly, consistent flow rule installation, especially in the case of policy change at the controller, needs to be carefully implemented. Effective network security and memory management, at both the network control and data planes, play a vital role in SDN. Furthermore, SDN simulation tools, controller platforms, and programming languages help academia and industry to implement and test their developed network applications. We also compare the existing SDN studies in detail in terms of classification and discuss their benefits and limitations. Finally, future research guidelines are provided, and the paper is concluded.

Indexed as

flow rule installation mechanismsmemory managementnetwork security and managementnetwork testing and verificationSDNSDN controller platformsSDN emulators and simulatorsSDN programming languages

Identifiers

PMID35898063
PMCPMC9331325
OpenAlexW4287879020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.