Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897884›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Literature Mining of Disease Associated Noncoding RNA in the Omics Era.

Jian Fan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Large Language Models for Non-Coding RNA Biomarker Discovery in Breast Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Editorial: Non-coding RNAs in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian FanApplied Linguistics Group, School of College English Teaching and Research, Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6807-3949
Henan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNA) are transcripts without protein-coding potential that play fundamental regulatory roles in diverse cellular processes and diseases. The application of deep sequencing experiments in ncRNA research have generated massive omics datasets, which require rapid examination, interpretation and validation based on exiting knowledge resources. Thus, text-mining methods have been increasingly adapted for automatic extraction of relations between an ncRNA and its target or a disease condition from biomedical literature. These bioinformatics tools can also assist in more complex research, such as database curation of candidate ncRNAs and hypothesis generation with respect to pathophysiological mechanisms. In this concise review, we first introduced basic concepts and workflow of literature mining systems. Then, we compared available bioinformatics tools tailored for ncRNA studies, including the tasks, applicability, and limitations. Their powerful utilities and flexibility are demonstrated by examples in a variety of diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerosis and cancers. Finally, we outlined several challenges from the viewpoints of both system developers and end users. We concluded that the application of text-mining techniques will booster disease-associated ncRNA discoveries in the biomedical literature and enable integrative biology in the current omics era.

Indexed as

Data MiningRNA, UntranslatedComputational BiologyPublicationsRNA, Untranslatedbiomedical literature miningdeep sequencingncRNAomics

Identifiers

PMID35897884
PMCPMC9331993
OpenAlexW4287148367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.