Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897758›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Retinal Toxicity Induced by Chemical Agents.

Daniel Souza Monteiro de Araújo, Rafael Brito, Danniel Pereira-Figueiredo, Alexandre Dos Santos-Rodrigues, Francesco De Logu, Romina Nassini, Andrea Zin, Karin C Calaza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Challenges and Opportunities in P450 Research on the Eye.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Souza Monteiro de AraújoDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-725X
Rafael BritoDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-201, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7070-3348
Danniel Pereira-FigueiredoDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-201, RJ, Brazil.
Alexandre Dos Santos-RodriguesDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-201, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1005-5967
Francesco De LoguDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8360-6929
Romina NassiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-8395
Andrea ZinClinical Research Unit, National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health, Fernandes Figueira, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 22250-020, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-0034
Karin C CalazaDepartment of Neurobiology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói 24210-201, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-1826
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversity of Florence · ITFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

Brazilian National Program of Support to the Health Assistance of the Person with Deficiency 25000.193451/2019-21Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/010.001493/2019Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E26/010.101037/2018Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/201.025/2021Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E26/202.977/2017Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/211.289/2021Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/211.462/2019National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 465346/2014-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision is an important sense for humans, and visual impairment/blindness has a huge impact in daily life. The retina is a nervous tissue that is essential for visual processing since it possesses light sensors (photoreceptors) and performs a pre-processing of visual information. Thus, retinal cell dysfunction or degeneration affects visual ability and several general aspects of the day-to-day of a person's lives. The retina has a blood-retinal barrier, which protects the tissue from a wide range of molecules or microorganisms. However, several agents, coming from systemic pathways, reach the retina and influence its function and survival. Pesticides are still used worldwide for agriculture, contaminating food with substances that could reach the retina. Natural products have also been used for therapeutic purposes and are another group of substances that can get to the retina. Finally, a wide number of medicines administered for different diseases can also affect the retina. The present review aimed to gather recent information about the hazard of these products to the retina, which could be used to encourage the search for more healthy, suitable, or less risky agents.

Indexed as

RetinaRetinal DegenerationBlood-Retinal BarrierHumansPhotoreceptor CellsVision, OcularVisual Perceptioncell deathmedicinalmedicinal herbsnatural productsneurotoxicitypesticidesretina

Identifiers

PMID35897758
PMCPMC9331776
OpenAlexW4287832175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.