Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897498›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Mental Illness and Work-Related Limitations in Healthcare Workers: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

Sara Gostoli, Laura Nicolucci, Carlotta Malaguti, Chiara Patierno, Danilo Carrozzino, Cristian Balducci, Sara Zaniboni, Vittorio Lodi, Carmine Petio, Chiara Rafanelli

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Risk of work-related health problems among community health agents.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara GostoliDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-4654
Laura NicolucciDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Carlotta MalagutiDepartment of Psychiatry, Bologna University Hospital Authority St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic IRCCS, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Chiara PatiernoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7043-8126
Danilo CarrozzinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8164-8671
Cristian BalducciDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-9971
Sara ZaniboniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7963-6057
Vittorio LodiOccupational Health Unit, Bologna University Hospital Authority St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic IRCCS, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Carmine PetioDepartment of Psychiatry, Bologna University Hospital Authority St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic IRCCS, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Chiara RafanelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-7918
University of Bologna · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective observational study investigated hospital staff requests for job fitness visits, addressed to occupational medicine. Specific objectives were to analyze: (1) health workers’ requests, sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnoses, assigned doctor’s fit notes, and (orthopedic, psychiatric) limitations; (2) associations between psychiatric diagnoses, sociodemographic (sex, age), and work-related (job, department) characteristics; (3) associations between the same psychiatric diagnoses/orthopedic limitations, fit notes, and/or psychiatric limitations. Data of St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic health workers (N = 149; F = 73.8%; mean age = 48 ± 9.6 years), visited by both the occupational medicine physician and psychiatrist (January 2016−May 2019), were analyzed. 83.2% of the sample presented with at least one psychiatric diagnosis, including mood (47%), anxiety (13.4%), and anxious-depressive (10.7%) disorders. Significant differences between psychiatric diagnoses according to sex and fit notes (both p < 0.01) have been found, whereas no significant associations based on age and work-related characteristics have been observed. Analysis of frequencies of participants with the same psychiatric diagnosis (orthopedic limitation being equal), according to doctor’s fit notes and psychiatric work limitations, showed a high heterogeneity of assignments. The current occupational medicine procedure for fit notes/job limitations assignments does not allow taking into consideration clinical factors possibly associated with more specific assignments. To standardize the procedure and translate the psychiatrist’s clinical judgment into practice, further studies to test the usefulness of clinimetrics, which might represent a reliable approach in considering different fit notes and job limitations, are needed.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersOccupational MedicineAdultAnxietyHumansMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalRetrospective Studiesclinimetricsfit notejob limitationoccupational medicinepsychiatric diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID35897498
PMCPMC9332465
OpenAlexW4288040267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.