Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897476›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

How to Engage Health Care Workers in the Evaluation of Hospitals: Development and Validation of BSC-HCW1-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Faten Amer, Sahar Hammoud, Haitham Khatatbeh, Huda Alfatafta, Abdulsalam Alkaiyat, Abdulnaser Ibrahim Nour, Dóra Endrei, Imre Boncz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faten AmerDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vorösmarty utca 4, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-3797
Sahar HammoudDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vorösmarty utca 4, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-9001
Haitham KhatatbehDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vorösmarty utca 4, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2019-6621
Huda AlfataftaDoctoral School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vorösmarty utca 4, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.
Abdulsalam AlkaiyatDivision of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine.
Abdulnaser Ibrahim NourFaculty of Economics and Social Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus P.O. Box 7, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0001-8525-9799
Dóra EndreiInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-1686
Imre BonczInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-6236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organizations worldwide utilize the balanced scorecard (BSC) for their performance evaluation (PE). This research aims to provide a tool that engages health care workers (HCWs) in BSC implementation (BSC-HCW1). Additionally, it seeks to translate and validate it at Palestinian hospitals. In a cross-sectional study, 454 questionnaires were retrieved from 14 hospitals. The composite reliability (CR), interitem correlation (IIC), and corrected item total correlation (CITC) were evaluated. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used. In both EFA and CFA, the scale demonstrated a good level of model fit. All the items had loadings greater than 0.50. All factors passed the discriminant validity. Although certain factors' convergent validity was less than 0.50, their CR, IIC, and CITC were adequate. The final best fit model had nine factors and 28 items in CFA. The BSC-HCW1 is the first self-administered questionnaire to engage HCWs in assessing the BSC dimensions following all applicable rules and regulations. The findings revealed that this instrument's psychometric characteristics were adequate. Therefore, the BSC-HCW1 can be utilized to evaluate BSC perspectives and dimensions. It will help managers highlight which BSC dimension predicts HCW satisfaction and loyalty and examine differences depending on HCWs' and hospital characteristics.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHospitalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbalanced scorecardhealth personnelhospitalloyaltyperformance evaluationqualitysatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35897476
PMCPMC9367997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.