SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Play Badminton Forever: A Systematic Review of Health Benefits.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06509607 (Effects of Lower Limb Concentric Versus Eccentric Dynamic Resistance Training on Agility and Speed in Badminton Players), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Lower Limb Concentric Versus Eccentric Dynamic Resistance Training on Agility and Speed in Badminton Players
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Match-play data according to playing categories in badminton: a systematic review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting movement intensity through anthro-fitness profiling and its association with match outcomes in youth badminton: a logistic regression-based machine approach.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- The impact of badminton participation on attention control in college students: the mediating role of flow experience.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Beyond Borders and Genders: Unveiling Cultural Influences on Badminton Motivation Among Older Adult Players in Taiwan and the United States.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AirBadminton for Physical Activity and Well-Being in Spanish Students: Post-COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Effect of 8 weeks badminton session on cardiovascular and neuromuscular functions among older adults in United Arab Emirates: a quasi-experimental study.F1000Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regular physical activity (PA) engagement has multiple benefits for individual general health at all ages and life stages. The present work focuses on badminton, which is one of the most popular sports worldwide. The aim was to conduct a systematic review focused on examining and analysing this sport and the benefits it brings to the health of those who engage in it. Examination was conducted from the viewpoint of overall health and provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art as presented in published scientific literature. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were adhered to. An exhaustive search was conducted of four electronic databases or search engines: Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE and Google Scholar. The search terms used were "badminton AND health" and "badminton AND benefits". In total, 27 studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. After analysing the results, it was concluded that badminton engagement may lead to an improvement in all areas, the most studied being those related to physical health, in particular the improvement of cardiac and pulmonary functions and the development of basic physical capacities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.