Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897354›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers-A Pilot Study.

Marcin Cyprowski, Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk, Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec, Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak, Rafał L Górny

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcin CyprowskiBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-4567
Anna Ławniczek-WałczykBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8234-340X
Agata Stobnicka-KupiecBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1212-0651
Małgorzata Gołofit-SzymczakBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.
Rafał L GórnyBiohazard Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Aerosol and Biological Hazards, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska Street, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.
Central Institute for Labour Protection · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the time-related changes in viable nasal bacteria concentrations among waste-incineration plant (WIP) workers compared to a group of office building (OB) workers outside the plant. In total, 20 volunteers participated in the study, including 14 WIP and 6 OB workers. WIP workers were divided into two sub-groups: supervisory staff (SVS) and maintenance and repair workers (MRW). Nasal swabs were collected before and after the morning work shift. Airborne bacteria were sampled with a six-stage impactor to assess the bioaerosol size distribution. The analysis showed that a significant, almost three-fold increase in nasal bacterial concentration was found only among WIP workers, and this referred mainly to anaerobic species. The load of anaerobic bacteria at the beginning of work was 12,988 CFU/mL, and after work shift 36,979 CFU/mL (p < 0.01). Significant increases in microbial concentrations was found only in the MRW subgroup, among non-smoking workers only. The results showed increased bacterial concentration in WIP nasal samples for as many as 12 bacterial species, including, e.g., Streptococcus constellatus, Peptostreptococcus spp., E. coli, and P. mirabilis. These preliminary data confirmed that the nasal swab method was helpful for assessment of the workers’ real-time exposure to airborne bacteria.

Indexed as

IncinerationOccupational ExposureAerosolsAir MicrobiologyBacteriaEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliHumansPilot ProjectsAerosolsbacterial aerosolsnasal swabssize distributionwaste-incineration plant workers

Identifiers

PMID35897354
PMCPMC9331216
OpenAlexW4287010193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.