Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897114›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke.

Suk Fun Cheng, Twan J van Velzen, John Gregson, Toby Richards, Hans Rolf Jäger, Robert Simister, M Eline Kooi, Gert J de Borst, Francesca B Pizzini, Paul J Nederkoorn and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Carotid atherosclerotic plaque microcalcification is independently associated with recurrent neurovascular events: A pilot study.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Suk Fun ChengStroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Twan J van VelzenDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John GregsonDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Toby RichardsFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Hans Rolf JägerNeuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Robert SimisterStroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
M Eline KooiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gert J de BorstDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francesca B PizziniRadiology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paul J Nederkoorn *Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin M Brown *Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. martin.brown@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-1356
Leo H Bonati *Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMaastricht University · NLNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUUK Dementia Research Institute · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

National Institute for Health Research PB-PG-0609-19216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.

methodsPatients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death. DISCUSSION: ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidPlaque, AtheroscleroticStrokeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsStentsTreatment OutcomeCarotid endarterectomyCarotid stenosisCarotid stentingIschaemic strokeMagnetic resonance imagingPlaque imagingRandomised controlled trialRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID35897114
PMCPMC9328625
OpenAlexW4288052540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.