Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897113›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

Enhancing the health of NHS staff: eTHOS - protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism, compared with usual care.

Rachel Adams, Rachel Jordan, Peymané Adab, Tim Barrett, Sheriden Bevan, Lucy Cooper, Ingrid DuRand, Pollyanna Hardy, Nicola Heneghan, Kate Jolly and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel AdamsInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-3854
Rachel JordanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.e.jordan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-6883
Peymané AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-3945
Tim BarrettBirmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6873-0750
Sheriden BevanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-4412
Lucy CooperBirmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2184-7908
Ingrid DuRandHereford County Hospital, Stonebow Road, Hereford, HR1 2ER, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-2687
Pollyanna HardyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2937-8368
Nicola HeneghanSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-3674
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115
Sue JowettInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-3745
Tom MarshallInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-5214
Margaret O'HaraPublic and Patient Involvement and Engagement, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-5183
Kiran RaiInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-0275
Hugh RickardsInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8678-5827
Ruth RileyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8774-5344
Steven SadhraInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8829-0986
Sarah TearneInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-2917
Gareth WaltersBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7436-2261
Elizabeth SapeyInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-5482
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBCounty Hospital · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 17/42/42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaff absenteeism and presenteeism incur high costs to the NHS and are associated with adverse health outcomes. The main causes are musculoskeletal complaints and mental ill-health, which are potentially modifiable, and cardiovascular risk factors are also common. We will test the feasibility of an RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an employee health screening clinic on reducing sickness absenteeism and presenteeism.

methodsThis is an individually randomised controlled pilot trial aiming to recruit 480 participants. All previously unscreened employees from four hospitals within three UK NHS hospital Trusts will be eligible. Those randomised to the intervention arm will be invited to attend an employee health screening clinic consisting of a screening assessment for musculoskeletal (STarT MSK and STarT Back), mental (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and cardiovascular (NHS Health Check if aged ≥ 40, lifestyle check if < 40 years) health. Screen positives will be given advice and/or referral to recommended services. Those randomised to the control arm will receive usual care. Participants will complete a questionnaire at baseline and 26 weeks; anonymised absenteeism and staff demographics will also be collected from personnel records. The co-primary outcomes are as follows: recruitment, referrals and uptake of recommended services in the intervention arm. Secondary outcomes include the following: results of screening assessments, uptake of individual referrals, reported changes in health behaviours, acceptability and feasibility of intervention, indication of contamination and costs. Outcomes related to the definitive trial include self-reported and employee records of absenteeism with reasons. Process evaluation to inform a future trial includes interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers receiving referrals. Analyses will include presentation of descriptive statistics, framework analysis for qualitative data and costs and consequences presented for health economics. DISCUSSION: The study will provide data to inform the design of a definitive RCT which aims to find an effective and cost-effective method of reducing absenteeism and presenteeism amongst NHS staff. The feasibility study will test trial procedures, and process outcomes, including the success of strategies for including underserved groups, and provide information and data to help inform the design and sample size for a definitive trial.

trial registrationISRCTN reference number 10237475 .

Indexed as

AbsenteeismEmployee healthHealthcare workersHealth screeningNHSOccupational healthPresenteeismRandomised controlled pilot trial

Identifiers

PMID35897113
PMCPMC9326142
OpenAlexW4288725075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.