Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897007›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2022

Estimating the risk of environmental contamination by forest users in African Swine Fever endemic areas.

Vincenzo Gervasi, Andrea Marcon, Vittorio Guberti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Estimation of RViruses · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincenzo GervasiIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Via Ca' Fornacetta, 9, 40064, Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy. vincenzo.gervasi@isprambiente.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6773-9227
Andrea MarconIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Via Ca' Fornacetta, 9, 40064, Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.
Vittorio GubertiIstituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Via Ca' Fornacetta, 9, 40064, Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · IT

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 773701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly lethal viral disease caused by the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), the only virus of the Asfaviridae family, which affects different species of wild and domestic suids, and for which no vaccination or effective medical treatment is currently available. The virus can survive for long periods in the environment, and humans can unintentionally act as vectors through infected fomites, a risk that is linked to the ASF introduction into pig farms. We ran a simulation study, in which we reconstructed the probability process leading to the different forms of human-mediated ASF contamination in ASF endemic areas. We compared the infection risks related to different types of human forest activities and produced estimates of the minimum expected number of human-induced contamination events occurring annually at the scale of some European countries.

resultsWhen analysed on a short temporal scale and in a relatively small spatial context, ASF environmental contamination appeared as a rather unlikely event for most of the simulated forest uses, with contamination probabilities often lower than 0.1%. When scaling up the contamination process to a whole year and to large geographic areas, though, the accumulation of the same forest activities, repeated several times per month within the same patch of forest, produced the expectation that thousands of contamination events would occur each year, with potentially relevant epidemiological consequences. Wild boar supplemental feeding and forest logging emerged as the riskiest activities in terms of contamination probabilities, but risk was highly influenced by the frequency and intensity of the different types of forest use.

conclusionsThe risk of human-mediated ASF environmental contamination should not be disregarded when planning management actions to reduce ASF circulation and prevent its breach into the pig farming system. Supplemental feeding should be strongly reduced or avoided in ASF affected areas. Wild boar hunting, which is often employed as an active management tool in ASF affected areas, should be seen as both a tool for controlling wild boar density and as a potential risk for further contamination. It is essential to implement and enforce strict biosecurity measures for all forest-based human activities in ASF endemic areas.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusSwine DiseasesAnimalsForestsHumansSus scrofaSwineASFAsfaviridaeBio-securityEpidemiologyInfected carcassPigsSus scrofaWild boar hunting

Identifiers

PMID35897007
PMCPMC9327371
OpenAlexW4288723487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.