Trial reportBMC neurology2022
Safety and efficacy of low-dose rt-PA with tirofiban to treat acute non-cardiogenic stroke: a single-center randomized controlled study.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07290751 (Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Adjunct tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a GRADE-guided meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy versus reperfusion therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke without large and medium vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of adjuvant tirofiban versus intravenous thrombolysis alone in acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Optimizing Early Antithrombotic Therapy Within 24 Hours of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Placebo on Excellent Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Multicenter, Randomized INSTANT Trial Protocol.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with ideal reperfusion: A cohort study of LAA and CE subgroups.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of simultaneous infusion of tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction: TITACIPPI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Early tirofiban administration after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (ADVENT): Study protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.European stroke journal · 2024Article
- Adding Tirofiban on Top of Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator May Improve Clinical Outcome in Acute Stroke Patients.Journal of stroke · 2024Article
- Intravenous thrombolysis plus tirofiban versus tirofiban alone in Caucasian patients with acute anterior choroidal or paramedian pontine infarction.Brain circulationArticle
- Early antiplatelet therapy was associated with reduced neurological deterioration in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is not enough and there is still the possibility of re-occlusion. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of infusing tirofiban after IVT.
methodsWe performed a prospective controlled study of 60 patients with acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke who were hospitalized in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received tirofiban for 24 h after IVT (rt-PA + T group) and those who did not receive postprocedural intravenous tirofiban (rt-PA group). The rt-PA + T group received low-dose rt-PA (0.6 mg/kg). The rt-PA group received standard dose rt-PA (0.9 mg/kg). The main outcome measure were safety, included the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality. The secondary outcome measure is curative efficacy which were evaluated by the 7d-NIHSS score and functional outcomes at 90 days. During hospitalization, the deterioration of neurological function was recorded.
resultsAll patients completed the follow-up with complete data, there were 30 patients in each of groups. The general characteristics between the two group patients had no statistically significant differences. Compared with the rt-PA + T group and the rt-PA group, in terms of safety, the rates of the sICH, severe systemic bleeding, and mortality in both groups were 0, and there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of any ICH between the two groups (10.0% vs. 3.3%, P = 0.306). In terms of efficacy, the rate of the early neurological deterioration events (END) was no statistical significance (0 vs. 6.6%, P = 0.246). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS score between the two groups before the IVT, and also at 24 h, however, the 7d-NIHSS score was lower in the rt-PA + T group compared with the rt-PA group (2.33 ± 1.85 vs. 4.80 ± 4.02, P = 0.004). At 90 days, 83.3% of patients in the rt-PA + T group had favorable functional outcomes compared with 60.0% of patients in the rt-PA group (P = 0.045).
conclusionsLow-dose rt-PA combined with tirofiban in acute non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke did not increase the risk of ICH, and mortality, and it was associated with neurological improvement.
trial registrationThe trial has been registered at the ChiCTR and identified as ChiCTR1800014666 (28/01/2018).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.