Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35897003›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Comparison of the relative sensitivity of two dimensional personality models to the psychopathological symptoms: the section III DSM-5 maladaptive traits versus affective temperaments.

Saeid Komasi, Azad Hemmati, Farzin Rezaei, Khaled Rahmani, Jouko Miettunen, Federico Amianto, Christopher J Hopwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saeid KomasiStudent Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. S_komasi63@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0198-3710
Azad HemmatiDepartment of Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-5987
Farzin RezaeiNeurosciences Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. frrezaie@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-2461
Khaled RahmaniLiver and Digestive Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0860-8040
Jouko MiettunenCenter for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, & Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0575-2669
Federico AmiantoDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychiatry Section, Regional Pilot Centre for Eating Disorders, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7079-8391
Christopher J HopwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-8645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A) are tools designed for personality dispositions for mental health symptoms. The present study was conducted to compare these models in terms of their relative sensitivity to the symptoms of personality disorders (PDs) and non-personality disorders (NPDs).

methodsSubjects in this cross-sectional study were 1232 (805 female; 63.5%) community samples in western Iran. Data were collected using the PID-5, the TEMPS-A, the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R), and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4). Correlations and Regression models were used to examine associations between traits and symptoms.

resultsMaladaptive traits assessed by the PID-5 were more strongly associated with PD symptoms, whereas affective temperaments measured by the TEMPS-A were more strongly associated with NPD symptoms.

conclusionThe present findings highlighted the practical utility of both the PID-5 and TEMPS-A indicating risk for psychopathology, but also suggest a distinction between PDs and NPDs in terms of underlying personality dispositions.

Indexed as

PersonalityTemperamentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPersonality DisordersPersonality InventorySurveys and QuestionnairesDimensional assessmentMental symptomsPersonality disorderPsychopathologyTemperament

Identifiers

PMID35897003
PMCPMC9327203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.