Trial reportCNS drugs2022
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Trial report in CNS drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04016779 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SPN-812 in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SPN-812 in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nonstimulant Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CNS drugs · 2023Pooled it
- Sensor-Based Assessment of Groove Music and Sports Dance on Cognitive-Emotional and Neuromuscular Functions in Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Trial
- Trial
- A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of centanafadine versus lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: long-term safety and efficacy.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Trial
- The Viloxazine Paradox: A Noradrenergic Agent's Journey From Antidepressant Obscurity to ADHD Precision Therapy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Updated Viloxazine Pharmacology: Experiments Establish Norepinephrine Transporter Occupancy and Serotonin 5-HTDrugs in R&D · 2026Article
- Reliability and convergent validity of the Japanese version of the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale: a multicenter, longitudinal, non-interventional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Viloxazine Extended-Release: A Review in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Cognitive Impairment in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Clinical Implications and Novel Treatment Strategies.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Treatment Preferences of Physicians Treating Adult Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the United States and Canada: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Viloxazine Compared to Placebo on Emotional, Behavioral, and Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
- Two single arm trials of AKL-T01, a digital therapeutic for adolescents and adults with ADHD.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- Assessment of centanafadine in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison vs lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, atomoxetine hydrochloride, and viloxazine extended-release.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Impact of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (QelbreeClinical drug investigation · 2024Article
- Review
- Treatment Preferences of Adult Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder - A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Efficacy and Safety of SPN-812 (Extended-Release Viloxazine) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a Narrative Review of Biological Mechanisms, Treatments, and Outcomes.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Extended-Release Viloxazine Compared with Atomoxetine for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.CNS drugs · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood and often persists into adulthood. Recent phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of viloxazine extended-release capsules (viloxazine ER; Qelbree
methodsThis was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm trial in adults (18-65 years of age) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to viloxazine ER (flexible dose of 200-600 mg/day) or matched placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline at end of study (week 6) in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) total score. The key secondary endpoint was the change from baseline at end of study in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score. Additional secondary outcome measures included the AISRS Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscales, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult (BRIEF-A), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7), and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I); each was analyzed at end of study. Responder rates on CGI scales and the AISRS were also assessed.
resultsA total of 374 subjects were randomized. At end of study, the mean viloxazine ER dose was 504 mg. The reduction in the change from baseline at end of study AISRS total score (least-square means ± standard error) was significantly greater in subjects treated with viloxazine ER (-15.5 ± 0.91) compared with placebo (-11.7 ± 0.90), p = 0.0040. The reduction in the CGI-S score was also significantly greater in subjects treated with viloxazine ER (-1.4 ± 0.10) compared with placebo (-1.0 ± 0.10), p = 0.0023. The viloxazine ER group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in the AISRS Inattention (p = 0.0015) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (p = 0.0380) subscales, the CGI-I (p = 0.0076), and the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (p = 0.0468) and Metacognition Index (p = 0.0100). Analysis of categorical secondary endpoints revealed that the viloxazine ER group had a significantly higher AISRS 30% response rate compared with placebo (p = 0.0395); all other comparisons were not significant. Many treatment effects (including the primary and key secondary endpoints) were significant by week 2. The most common treatment-related adverse events that occurred in ≥5% of subjects receiving viloxazine ER were insomnia (14.8%), fatigue (11.6%), nausea (10.1%), decreased appetite (10.1%), dry mouth (9.0%), and headache (9.0%). Viloxazine ER was well tolerated, with a 9.0% discontinuation rate due to adverse events compared with 4.9% in the placebo group.
conclusionsTreatment with viloxazine ER resulted in a statistically significant improvement in primary and key secondary endpoints, indicating improvements in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomology, executive function, and overall clinical illness severity in adults. Viloxazine ER was well tolerated at the tested doses in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04016779.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.