Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896851›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

A prognostic survival model for women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in Queensland, Australia.

Peter D Baade, Helen Fowler, Kou Kou, Jeff Dunn, Suzanne K Chambers, Chris Pyke, Joanne F Aitken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter D BaadeCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. peterbaade@cancerqld.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-8868
Helen FowlerCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2233-3183
Kou KouCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-5949
Jeff DunnProstate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1180-3381
Suzanne K ChambersFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2369-6111
Chris PykeMater Hospitals South Brisbane, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-0742
Joanne F AitkenCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-2186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrognostic models can help inform patients on the future course of their cancer and assist the decision making of clinicians and patients in respect to management and treatment of the cancer. In contrast to previous studies considering survival following treatment, this study aimed to develop a prognostic model to quantify breast cancer-specific survival at the time of diagnosis.

methodsA large (n = 3323), population-based prospective cohort of women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in Queensland, Australia between 2010 and 2013, and followed up to December 2018. Data were collected through a validated semi-structured telephone interview and a self-administered questionnaire, along with data linkage to the Queensland Cancer Register and additional extraction from medical records. Flexible parametric survival models, with multiple imputation to deal with missing data, were used.

resultsKey factors identified as being predictive of poorer survival included more advanced stage at diagnosis, higher tumour grade, "triple negative" breast cancers, and being symptom-detected rather than screen detected. The Harrell's C-statistic for the final predictive model was 0.84 (95% CI 0.82, 0.87), while the area under the ROC curve for 5-year mortality was 0.87. The final model explained about 36% of the variation in survival, with stage at diagnosis alone explaining 26% of the variation.

conclusionsIn addition to confirming the prognostic importance of stage, grade and clinical subtype, these results highlighted the independent survival benefit of breast cancers diagnosed through screening, although lead and length time bias should be considered. Understanding what additional factors contribute to the substantial unexplained variation in survival outcomes remains an important objective.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAustraliaFemaleHumansPrognosisProspective StudiesQueenslandAustraliaBreast cancerPrognosisScreeningStageSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35896851
PMCPMC9374611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.