Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A nationwide study of patients operated for cervical degenerative disorders in public and private hospitals.

Elisabet Danielsen, Christer Mjåset, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Sasha Gulati, Margreth Grotle, Jan Håkon Rudolfsen, Øystein P Nygaard, Tore K Solberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabet DanielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. elisabet.danielsen@gmail.com.
Christer MjåsetFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tor IngebrigtsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Sasha GulatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Margreth GrotleCentre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Håkon RudolfsenDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Øystein P NygaardDepartment of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Tore K SolbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
St Olav's University Hospital · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decades, there has been an increase in the rate of surgery for degenerative disorders of the cervical spine and in the use of supplementary private health insurance. Still, there is limited knowledge about the differences in characteristics of patients operated in public and private hospitals. Therefore, we aimed at comparing sociodemographic-, clinical- and patient management data on patients operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway. This was a cross-sectional study on patients in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy between January 2012 and December 2020. At admission for surgery, we assessed disability by the following patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): neck disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and numerical rating scales for neck pain (NRS-NP) and arm pain (NRS-AP). Among 9161 patients, 7344 (80.2%) procedures were performed in public hospitals and 1817 (19.8%) in private hospitals. Mean age was 52.1 years in public hospitals and 49.7 years in private hospitals (P < 0.001). More women were operated in public hospitals (47.9%) than in private hospitals (31.6%) (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of patients in private hospitals had high education (≥ 4 years of college or university) (42.9% vs 35.6%, P < 0.001). Patients in public hospitals had worse disease-specific health problems than those in private hospitals: unadjusted NDI mean difference was 5.2 (95% CI 4.4 - 6.0; P < 0.001) and adjusted NDI mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5 - 4.2; P < 0.001), and they also had longer duration of symptoms (P < 0.001). Duration of surgery (mean difference 29 minutes, 95% CI 27.1 - 30.7; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean difference 2 days, 95% CI 2.3 - 2.4; P < 0.001) were longer in public hospitals. In conclusion, patients operated for degenerative cervical spine in private hospitals were healthier, younger, better educated and more often men. They also had less and shorter duration of symptoms and seemed to be managed more efficiently. Our findings indicate that access to cervical spine surgery in private hospitals could be skewed in favour of patients with higher socioeconomic status.

Indexed as

RadiculopathySpinal Cord DiseasesCervical VertebraeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, PrivateHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35896806
PMCPMC9329342
OpenAlexW4288058149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.