Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896796›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Production of pine sawdust biochar supporting phosphate-solubilizing bacteria as an alternative bioinoculant in Allium cepa L., culture.

Andrea Blanco-Vargas, María A Chacón-Buitrago, María C Quintero-Duque, Raúl A Poutou-Piñales, Lucía A Díaz-Ariza, Carlos A Devia-Castillo, Laura C Castillo-Carvajal, Daniel Toledo-Aranda, Christiano da Conceição de Matos, Wilmar Olaya-González and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Guadua angustifolia biochar/TiOScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrea Blanco-VargasLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA), Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7ma No 43-82, Edifício 50 Lab. 106, 110-23, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
María A Chacón-BuitragoLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA), Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7ma No 43-82, Edifício 50 Lab. 106, 110-23, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
María C Quintero-DuqueLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA), Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7ma No 43-82, Edifício 50 Lab. 106, 110-23, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.
Raúl A Poutou-PiñalesLaboratorio de Biotecnología Molecular, Grupo de Biotecnología Ambiental e Industrial (GBAI), Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Lucía A Díaz-ArizaLaboratorio Asociaciones Suelo, Planta, Microorganismo (LAMIC). Grupo de Investigación en Agricultura Biológica, Departamento de Biología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Carlos A Devia-CastilloFacultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Departamento de Ecología y Territorio. Pontificia, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Laura C Castillo-CarvajalFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Campus Norte, México, D.F., Mexico.
Daniel Toledo-ArandaFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Campus Norte, México, D.F., Mexico.
Christiano da Conceição de MatosDepartamento de Ciências Agrárias e Naturais, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Ituiutaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Wilmar Olaya-GonzálezLaboratorio Asociaciones Suelo, Planta, Microorganismo (LAMIC). Grupo de Investigación en Agricultura Biológica, Departamento de Biología. Facultad de Ciencias. Pontificia, Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Oswaldo Ramos-MonroyInstituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N, Col. Santo Tomás, 11340, México CDMX, Mexico.
Aura M Pedroza-RodríguezLaboratorio de Microbiología Ambiental y de Suelos, Unidad de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (UNIDIA), Departamento de Microbiología. Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Carrera 7ma No 43-82, Edifício 50 Lab. 106, 110-23, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. apedroza@javeriana.edu.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We produced and characterised biochar made from Caribbean pine sawdust as raw material. The biochar (BC

Indexed as

PhosphatesPinusBacteriaCharcoalOnionsSoilbiocharCharcoalPhosphatesSoil

Identifiers

PMID35896796
PMCPMC9329452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.