ArticleScientific reports2022
Automated histological classification for digital pathology images of colonoscopy specimen via deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- COOT-CNN: joint architecture and training-strategy optimization for binary colorectal histology patch classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Two decades of artificial intelligence in colon cancer diagnosis and treatment: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2003-2023).Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Application of convolutional neural networks for histopathological diagnosis of feline low-grade T-cell lymphoma and lymphoplasmacytic enteritis in intestinal biopsies.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Deep learning model for grading carcinoma with Gini-based feature selection and linear production-inspired feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainability of a Deep Learning-Based Classification Model for Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Glomerulonephritis.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Spatial integration of multi-omics data from serial sections using the novel Multi-Omics Imaging Integration Toolset.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Deep learning model to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis from haematoxylin/eosin-stained myocardial tissue.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Improving performance in colorectal cancer histology decomposition using deep and ensemble machine learning.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Estimating infant age from skull X-ray images using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: from detection to diagnosis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Evaluating ChatGPT's diagnostic potential for pathology images.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Breaking Barriers: AI's Influence on Pathology and Oncology in Resource-Scarce Medical Systems.Cancers · 2023Review
- Breast cancer histopathology image-based gene expression prediction using spatial transcriptomics data and deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- AI in Pathology: What could possibly go wrong?Seminars in diagnostic pathology · 2023Review
- On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: A novel Prospect.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is an effective tool to detect colorectal lesions and needs the support of pathological diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate deep learning models that automatically classify digital pathology images of colon lesions obtained from colonoscopy-related specimen. Histopathological slides of colonoscopic biopsy or resection specimens were collected and grouped into six classes by disease category: adenocarcinoma, tubular adenoma (TA), traditional serrated adenoma (TSA), sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), hyperplastic polyp (HP), and non-specific lesions. Digital photographs were taken of each pathological slide to fine-tune two pre-trained convolutional neural networks, and the model performances were evaluated. A total of 1865 images were included from 703 patients, of which 10% were used as a test dataset. For six-class classification, the mean diagnostic accuracy was 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.0-98.6%) by DenseNet-161 and 95.9% (95% CI 94.1-97.7%) by EfficientNet-B7. The per-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was highest for adenocarcinoma (1.000; 95% CI 0.999-1.000) by DenseNet-161 and TSA (1.000; 95% CI 1.000-1.000) by EfficientNet-B7. The lowest per-class AUCs were still excellent: 0.991 (95% CI 0.983-0.999) for HP by DenseNet-161 and 0.995 for SSA (95% CI 0.992-0.998) by EfficientNet-B7. Deep learning models achieved excellent performances for discriminating adenocarcinoma from non-adenocarcinoma lesions with an AUC of 0.995 or 0.998. The pathognomonic area for each class was appropriately highlighted in digital images by saliency map, particularly focusing epithelial lesions. Deep learning models might be a useful tool to help the diagnosis for pathologic slides of colonoscopy-related specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.