Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896766›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2023

Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus.

Frank A Rasulo, Philip Hopkins, Francisco A Lobo, Pierre Pandin, Basil Matta, Carla Carozzi, Stefano Romagnoli, Anthony Absalom, Rafael Badenes, Thomas Bleck and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06667869 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Sistema de monitorización multiparámetros Para sedación de Pacientes críticos en UCI (ROMANTIC: multipaRameter mOnitoring systeM for sedAtion iNThe ICu)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2025 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsSedation ComplicationArmsSedative
NCT06991777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study: Precision Sedation in Intensive Care Using Neurophysiologic and Respiratory Targets.

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsPrecision sedation in intensive care using neurophysiologic and respiratory targets.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Target controlled infusion in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polyelectromyography Under Propofol to Differentiate Functional from Idiopathic Dystonia: A Pilot Study.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Comparison of NeuroSENSEEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Sedation in Critically Ill Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 18 institutions in 8 countries.

Frank A RasuloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy. francesco.rasulo@unibs.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-569X
Philip HopkinsInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Francisco A LoboInstitute of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Pierre PandinDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Basil MattaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Carla CarozziDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Stefano RomagnoliDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Anthony AbsalomDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Thomas BleckDivision of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Anselmo CaricatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Gemelli University Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Jan ClaassenDepartment of Neurocritical Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
André DenaultCritical Care Division, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Cristina HonoratoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Saba MottaScientific Library, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Geert MeyfroidtDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospitals Leuven and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Finn Michael RadtkeDepartment of Anesthesiology IRS, Nykøbing F. Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.
Zaccaria RicciDepartment of Pediatric Anesthesia, Meyer University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino and University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Fabio S TacconeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Paul VespaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neurocritical Care, Los Angeles Medical Center, Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ida NardielloDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Massimo LampertiInstitute of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USKU Leuven · BEMeyer Children's Hospital · ITMontreal Heart Institute · CANorthwestern University · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSjællands Universitetshospital, Nykøbing F. · DKUniversidad de Navarra · ESUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversitat de València · ESUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of processed electroencephalography (pEEG) for depth of sedation (DOS) monitoring is increasing in anesthesia; however, how to use of this type of monitoring for critical care adult patients within the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear.

methodsA multidisciplinary panel of international experts consisting of 21 clinicians involved in monitoring DOS in ICU patients was carefully selected on the basis of their expertise in neurocritical care and neuroanesthesiology. Panelists were assigned four domains (techniques for electroencephalography [EEG] monitoring, patient selection, use of the EEG monitors, competency, and training the principles of pEEG monitoring) from which a list of questions and statements was created to be addressed. A Delphi method based on iterative approach was used to produce the final statements. Statements were classified as highly appropriate or highly inappropriate (median rating ≥ 8), appropriate (median rating ≥ 7 but < 8), or uncertain (median rating < 7) and with a strong disagreement index (DI) (DI < 0.5) or weak DI (DI ≥ 0.5 but < 1) consensus.

resultsAccording to the statements evaluated by the panel, frontal pEEG (which includes a continuous colored density spectrogram) has been considered adequate to monitor the level of sedation (strong consensus), and it is recommended by the panel that all sedated patients (paralyzed or nonparalyzed) unfit for clinical evaluation would benefit from DOS monitoring (strong consensus) after a specific training program has been performed by the ICU staff. To cover the gap between knowledge/rational and routine application, some barriers must be broken, including lack of knowledge, validation for prolonged sedation, standardization between monitors based on different EEG analysis algorithms, and economic issues.

conclusionsEvidence on using DOS monitors in ICU is still scarce, and further research is required to better define the benefits of using pEEG. This consensus highlights that some critically ill patients may benefit from this type of neuromonitoring.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaCritical IllnessAdultCritical CareElectroencephalographyHumansConsensusCritically illEEGMonitoringSedation

Identifiers

PMID35896766
PMCPMC10090014
OpenAlexW4288052827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.