ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2023
News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Effects and Safety Outcomes of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in Patients with Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Penile shear-wave elastography predicts the outcome of botulinum neurotoxin (Botox) in the management of non-responders to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors: A pilot study.Arab journal of urology · 2025Article
- Argonaute 2 Restores Erectile Function by Enhancing Angiogenesis and Reducing Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Streptozotocin (STZ)-Induced Type-1 Diabetic Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Recent advances in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.Expert opinion on biological therapyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significant discontinuation rate of available therapies and the paucity of curative options promoted the research on potential novel treatments suitable for erectile dysfunction patients. The aim of this study was to provide a summary of available evidence regarding the news and future perspectives related to the non-surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases was done. Papers in English-language, published until April 2022, were included. No chronological restriction was applied. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies, as well as meta-analyses, were considered. Oro-dispersible formulations of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are particularly indicated in patients who have difficulty in swallowing solid dosage form; in addition, they constitute a discrete route of administration not requiring water. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy is indicated in mild vasculogenic erectile dysfunction and in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction poorly responsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and gene therapy seem promising regenerative treatments for selected patients with erectile dysfunction. Novel oral formulations of drugs commonly used in erectile dysfunction patients have recently become part of standard clinical practice. Regenerative treatments have been emerging in recent years and could become routine curative options in the near future. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence on this topic and guide appropriate recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.