ArticleCommunications biology2022
Real-world size of objects serves as an axis of object space.
Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential experience reshapes population representations in visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Human EEG and artificial neural networks reveal disentangled representations and processing timelines of object real-world size and depth in natural images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping object space dimensions: New insights from temporal dynamics.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Body size as a metric for the affordable world.eLife · 2024Article
- Cortical topographic motifs emerge in a self-organized map of object space.Science advances · 2023Article
- Spikiness and animacy as potential organizing principles of human ventral visual cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our mind can represent various objects from physical world in an abstract and complex high-dimensional object space, with axes encoding critical features to quickly and accurately recognize objects. Among object features identified in previous neurophysiological and fMRI studies that may serve as the axes, objects' real-world size is of particular interest because it provides not only visual information for broad conceptual distinctions between objects but also ecological information for objects' affordance. Here we use deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), which enable direct manipulation of visual experience and units' activation, to explore how objects' real-world size is extracted to construct the axis of object space. Like the human brain, the DCNNs pre-trained for object recognition also encode objects' size as an independent axis of the object space. Further, we find that the shape of objects, rather than retinal size, context, task demands or texture features, is critical to inferring objects' size for both DCNNs and humans. In short, with DCNNs as a brain-like model, our study devises a paradigm supplemental to conventional approaches to explore the structure of object space, which provides computational support for empirical observations on human perceptual and neural representations of objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.