ArticleScientific reports2022
A comparison of IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters in cataract patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repeatability of keratometry depending on tear film osmolarity.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Myopic Progression Associated with COVID-19 Pandemic in Korean Children with Myopia Using 0.01% Atropine Eyedrops.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of ocular biometry in Korean using swept-source optical coherence tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Accuracy of 7 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in primary angle-closure glaucoma eyes, according to axial length and anterior chamber depth.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Morphologic features of crystalline lens in cataract patients with different lens sclerosis and axial length.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- A 10-year retrospective study on the prevalence and biometric characteristics of high myopia in Chinese cataract surgery candidates.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interocular Asymmetry of OCT Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Values in a Normative Population: The Framingham Heart Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Axis Accuracy between Optical Biometry and Dual Scheimpflug Topography.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- Alpha and Kappa angle on postoperative visual quality in cataract surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Optimizing IOL Calculators with Deep Learning Prediction of Total Corneal Astigmatism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Axial length and keratometry characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Saudi Arabia.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Article
- Surgical approaches to correct corneal astigmatism at time of cataract surgery: a mini-review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- Agreement of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the IOLMaster 700 Optical Biometers in Myopic Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the agreement of ocular biometric parameters measured by IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700. This is a prospective study. IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 were used to measure the axial eye length (AL), corneal flat keratometry (Kf), corneal steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), corneal astigmatism(CA), J0, J45, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and corneal horizontal diameter (white-to-white distance, WTW) of 518 eyes (392 patients) with cataracts. Patients were enrolled unilaterally. Subgroup analyses were done according to the AL and Km. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to evaluate the agreement. A total of 275 eyes were analyzed. The 95% confidence interval of ICC of the mean AL, Ks, Kf, Km, J0, and ACD values measured by the two instruments are indicative of excellent reliability (P < 0.001). The measurement results of WTW show good reliability (P < 0.001). The ICC of CA is of good reliability in CA < 0.5 D group (P = 0.000) and moderate reliability in the other two groups (P = 0.000). The WTW is the widest range among 95% consistency of the limit range measured by the two instruments. The results of IOLMaster 500 and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL, keratometry, and ACD in cataract patients are of high agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.