Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896643›Full record

ReviewNature2022

Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation.

Andrew J Daley, Immanuel Bloch, Christian Kokail, Stuart Flannigan, Natalie Pearson, Matthias Troyer, Peter Zoller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Autoencoding-Assisted Quantum Cloning Machine.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Quantum computing applications in drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Superextensive electrical power from a quantum battery.Light, science & applications · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew J DaleyDepartment of Physics and SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK. andrew.daley@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-7761
Immanuel BlochMax Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0679-4759
Christian KokailUniversität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stuart FlanniganDepartment of Physics and SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Natalie PearsonDepartment of Physics and SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Matthias TroyerMicrosoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-9444
Peter ZollerUniversität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-1505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of quantum computing across several technologies and platforms has reached the point of having an advantage over classical computers for an artificial problem, a point known as 'quantum advantage'. As a next step along the development of this technology, it is now important to discuss 'practical quantum advantage', the point at which quantum devices will solve problems of practical interest that are not tractable for traditional supercomputers. Many of the most promising short-term applications of quantum computers fall under the umbrella of quantum simulation: modelling the quantum properties of microscopic particles that are directly relevant to modern materials science, high-energy physics and quantum chemistry. This would impact several important real-world applications, such as developing materials for batteries, industrial catalysis or nitrogen fixing. Much as aerodynamics can be studied either through simulations on a digital computer or in a wind tunnel, quantum simulation can be performed not only on future fault-tolerant digital quantum computers but also already today through special-purpose analogue quantum simulators. Here we overview the state of the art and future perspectives for quantum simulation, arguing that a first practical quantum advantage already exists in the case of specialized applications of analogue devices, and that fully digital devices open a full range of applications but require further development of fault-tolerant hardware. Hybrid digital-analogue devices that exist today already promise substantial flexibility in near-term applications.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.