ArticleScientific reports2022
Automated sleep stage scoring employing a reasoning mechanism and evaluation of its explainability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Disorder-specific alterations of transient oscillatory dynamics during sleep across cortical and subcortical networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable vision transformer for automatic visual sleep staging on multimodal PSG signals.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- What radio waves tell us about sleep!Sleep · 2025Article
- An ensemble method for improving robustness against the electrode contact problems in automated sleep stage scoring.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- NAPping PAnts (NAPPA): An open wearable solution for monitoring Infant's sleeping rhythms, respiration and posture.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Validation of sleep-staging accuracy for an in-home sleep electroencephalography device compared with simultaneous polysomnography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A study on feature selection using multi-domain feature extraction for automated k-complex detection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Automatic sleep staging by a hybrid model based on deep 1D-ResNet-SE and LSTM with single-channel raw EEG signals.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scoring sleep stages from biological signals is an essential but labor-intensive inspection for sleep diagnosis. The existing automated scoring methods have achieved high accuracy but are not widely applied in clinical practice. In our understanding, the existing methods have failed to establish the trust of sleep experts (e.g., physicians and clinical technologists) due to a lack of ability to explain the evidences/clues for scoring. In this study, we developed a deep-learning-based scoring model with a reasoning mechanism called class activation mapping (CAM) to solve this problem. This mechanism explicitly shows which portions of the signals support our model's sleep stage decision, and we verified that these portions overlap with the "characteristic waves," which are evidences/clues used in the manual scoring process. In exchange for the acquisition of explainability, employing CAM makes it difficult to follow some scoring rules. Although we concerned the negative effect of CAM on the scoring accuracy, we have found that the impact is limited. The evaluation experiment shows that the proposed model achieved a scoring accuracy of [Formula: see text]. It is superior to those of some existing methods and the inter-rater reliability among the sleep experts. These results suggest that Sleep-CAM achieved both explainability and required scoring accuracy for practical usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.