Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896591›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Body size, shape and ecology in tetrapods.

Alice E Maher, Gustavo Burin, Philip G Cox, Thomas W Maddox, Susannah C R Maidment, Natalie Cooper, Emma R Schachner, Karl T Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New perspectives on head and neck allometry and ecomorphology in tetrapods.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. New perspectives on body size and shape evolution in dinosaurs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. When the lung invades: a review of avian postcranial skeletal pneumaticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Diet and habitat as determinants of intestine length in fishes.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alice E MaherDepartment of Musculoskeletal & Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course & Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK. Alice.Maher@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7544-3947
Gustavo BurinNatural History Museum, London, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7851-0666
Philip G CoxDepartment of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, PalaeoHub, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-2358
Thomas W MaddoxSchool of Veterinary Science, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8636-5040
Susannah C R MaidmentDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2500
Natalie CooperNatural History Museum, London, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-8655
Emma R SchachnerDepartment of Cell Biology & Anatomy, School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-925X
Karl T BatesDepartment of Musculoskeletal & Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course & Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-141X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R016380/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body size and shape play fundamental roles in organismal function and it is expected that animals may possess body proportions that are well-suited to their ecological niche. Tetrapods exhibit a diverse array of body shapes, but to date this diversity in body proportions and its relationship to ecology have not been systematically quantified. Using whole-body skeletal models of 410 extinct and extant tetrapods, we show that allometric relationships vary across individual body segments thereby yielding changes in overall body shape as size increases. However, we also find statistical support for quadratic relationships indicative of differential scaling in small-medium versus large animals. Comparisons of locomotor and dietary groups highlight key differences in body proportions that may mechanistically underlie occupation of major ecological niches. Our results emphasise the pivotal role of body proportions in the broad-scale ecological diversity of tetrapods.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcologyAnimalsBody Size

Identifiers

PMID35896591
PMCPMC9329317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.