ArticleScientific reports2022
Development and validation of a hypertension risk prediction model and construction of a risk score in a Canadian population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic risk models for incident hypertension: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Hypertension and Its Risk Factors Among Adults in the Northern Region of Bangladesh.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a population-based prediction model for prevalent hypertension: evidence from Qatar biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic and lifestyle determinants of blood pressure in adult Nigerians.International health · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of an Incident Hypertension Risk Prediction Model for Young Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Developing and validating a nomogram prediction model for osteoporosis risk in the UK biobank: a national prospective cohort.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Further insights into influence factors of hypertension in older patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a model based on multiple centers.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of hypertension in Bangladesh.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Development of risk models of incident hypertension using machine learning on the HUNT study data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- A comparison of machine learning algorithms and traditional regression-based statistical modeling for predicting hypertension incidence in a Canadian population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Predicting the risk of hypertension using machine learning algorithms: A cross sectional study in Ethiopia.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying high-risk individuals for targeted intervention may prevent or delay hypertension onset. We developed a hypertension risk prediction model and subsequent risk sore among the Canadian population using measures readily available in a primary care setting. A Canadian cohort of 18,322 participants aged 35-69 years without hypertension at baseline was followed for hypertension incidence, and 625 new hypertension cases were reported. At a 2:1 ratio, the sample was randomly divided into derivation and validation sets. In the derivation sample, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop the model, and the model's performance was evaluated in the validation sample. Finally, a risk score table was created incorporating regression coefficients from the model. The multivariable Cox model identified age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, total physical activity time, and cardiovascular disease as significant risk factors (p < 0.05) of hypertension incidence. The variable sex was forced to enter the final model. Some interaction terms were identified as significant but were excluded due to their lack of incremental predictive capacity. Our model showed good discrimination (Harrel's C-statistic 0.77) and calibration (Grønnesby and Borgan test, [Formula: see text] statistic = 8.75, p = 0.07; calibration slope 1.006). A point-based score for the risks of developing hypertension was presented after 2-, 3-, 5-, and 6 years of observation. This simple, practical prediction score can reliably identify Canadian adults at high risk of developing incident hypertension in the primary care setting and facilitate discussions on modifying this risk most effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.