Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Construction of a new automatic grading system for jaw bone mineral density level based on deep learning using cone beam computed tomography.

Yanjun Xiao, Qihui Liang, Lin Zhou, Xuezhi He, Lingfeng Lv, Jiang Chen, Su Endian, Guo Jianbin, Dong Wu, Lin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanjun Xiao *Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial and Stomatological Key Lab of Fujian College and University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qihui Liang *Newland Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Lin ZhouFujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Xuezhi HeNewland Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Lingfeng LvInstitute of Stomatology and Research Center of Dental and Craniofacial Implant, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jiang ChenStomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Su EndianFujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Fujian Medical University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Guo JianbinInstitute of Stomatology and Research Center of Dental and Craniofacial Implant, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Dong WuInstitute of Stomatology and Research Center of Dental and Craniofacial Implant, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. wudong@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9469-831X
Lin LinNewland Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian, China. linl@newlandcomputer.com.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and verify an automatic classification method using artificial intelligence deep learning to determine the bone mineral density level of the implant site in oral implant surgery from radiographic data obtained from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Seventy patients with mandibular dentition defects were scanned using CBCT. These Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data were cut into 605 training sets, and then the data were processed with data standardization, and the Hounsfiled Unit (HU) value level was determined as follows: Type 1, 1000-2000; type 2, 700-1000; type 3, 400-700; type 4, 100-400; and type 5, - 200-100. Four trained dental implant physicians manually identified and classified the area of the jaw bone density level in the image using the software LabelMe. Then, with the assistance of the HU value generated by LabelMe, a physician with 20 years of clinical experience confirmed the labeling level. Finally, the HU mean values of various categories marked by dental implant physicians were compared to the mean values detected by the artificial intelligence model to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence classification. After the model was trained on 605 training sets, the statistical results of the HU mean values of various categories in the dataset detected by the model were almost the same as the HU grading interval on the data annotation. This new classification provides a more detailed solution to guide surgeons to adjust the drilling rate and tool selection during preoperative decision-making and intraoperative hole preparation for oral implant surgery.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDental ImplantsArtificial IntelligenceBone DensityCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMandibleDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID35896558
PMCPMC9329319
OpenAlexW4288052715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.