Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896298›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Doctor! Did you Google my symptoms? A qualitative study of patient perceptions of doctors' point-of-care information seeking.

Isaac Tranter, Mieke L van Driel, Ben Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isaac TranterGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Herston, Queensland, Australia i.tranter@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3110-2109
Mieke L van DrielGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-9553
Ben MitchellGeneral Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore patient perceptions regarding doctors' information seeking during consultations. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative interviews with participants from six general practice waiting rooms in South East Queensland, Australia. Participants were asked about their experiences and opinions, and to comment on short videos of simulated consultations in which a doctor sought information. The interviews were analysed through a process of iterative thematic analysis using the framework of Braun and Clarke.

participantsThe 16 participants were purposively sampled including 5 men and 11 women from a diverse range of educational and age groups.

resultsHow a doctor's need to look up information impacted patient impressions of competence and trust was an overarching theme. The four dominant themes include: the trust a patient has in the doctor before the consultation, whether the doctor is expected to know the answer to a question without searching, has the doctor added value to the consultation by searching and the consultation skills used in the process.

conclusionsPatient trust is fundamental to positive perceptions of general practitioners' information seeking at the point-of-care. Communication is key to building this trust. Understanding the patient's agenda, listening, assessing thoroughly and being honest and transparent about the need to seek information all contribute to a positive experience.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMalePoint-of-Care SystemsSearch Engineinformation managementprimary careworld Wide Web technology

Identifiers

PMID35896298
PMCPMC9335025
OpenAlexW4288455549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.