Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896122›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2023

Experience with Implementing a Beta-lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Service in a Burn Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Mohammad Alshaer, Pavel Mazirka, Gena Burch, Charles Peloquin, Zachary Drabick, Joshua Carson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AlshaerInfectious Disease Pharmacokinetics Laboratory College of Pharmacy, and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Pavel MazirkaDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-3292
Gena BurchCollege of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Charles PeloquinCollege of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Zachary DrabickCollege of Pharmacy and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Joshua CarsonThe Loyola Burn Center, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
University of Florida · USLoyola University Medical Center · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal injuries alter pharmacokinetics, complicating the prediction of standard antibiotic dose effectiveness. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to prevent subtherapeutic dosing of antibiotic therapy, but remains scarcely studied in the burn patient population. A retrospective chart review of burn patients receiving beta-lactam TDM from 2016 to 2019 was conducted. Adult patients with thermal injury receiving cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, or meropenem for ≥48 hours were included. Between February 2016 and July 2017, we utilized selective TDM based on clinical judgement to guide treatment. From October 2018 until July 2019, TDM was expanded to all burn patients on beta-lactams. The primary endpoint was achievement of therapeutic concentration, and the secondary endpoints were clinical cure, culture clearance, new resistance, length of stay, and mortality. The selective (control) group included 19 patients and the universal (study) group reviewed 23 patients. In both groups, skin and lungs were the most common primary infection sources, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the most common species. In the universal cohort, patients were older with higher risk factors, but more frequently achieved the target drug concentration, required less days to start TDM (p < .0001), and had more frequent measurements and beta-lactam dose adjustments. Positive clinical outcome was reported in 77%, and microbial eradication in 82% of all patients. All clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. The implementation of beta-lactam TDM protocol shortened the time, increased the probability of appropriate target attainment, and individualized beta-lactam therapy in burn patients.

Indexed as

beta-LactamsBurnsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID35896122
PMCPMC9825314
OpenAlexW4288077761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.