Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35896020›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Development of an Interoperable and Easily Transferable Clinical Decision Support System Deployment Platform: System Design and Development Study.

Junsang Yoo, Jeonghoon Lee, Ji Young Min, Sae Won Choi, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Insook Cho, Chiyeon Lim, Mi Young Choi, Won Chul Cha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Evaluation of an electronic health record Drug Interaction Customization Editor (DICE).American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  5. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Junsang Yoo *Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-7644
Jeonghoon Lee *HD Junction, Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-6811
Ji Young MinLINEWALKS Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-3316
Sae Won ChoiOffice of Hospital Information, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-8227
Joon-Myoung KwonMedical Research Team, Medical AI Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6754-1010
Insook ChoNursing Department, School of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5152-9567
Chiyeon LimDepartment of Biostatistics, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-6976
Mi Young ChoiData Service Center, en-core Co, Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-2350
Won Chul ChaDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2778-2992
Samsung (South Korea) · KRDongguk University · KRInha University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA clinical decision support system (CDSS) is recognized as a technology that enhances clinical efficacy and safety. However, its full potential has not been realized, mainly due to clinical data standards and noninteroperable platforms.

objectiveIn this paper, we introduce the common data model-based intelligent algorithm network environment (CANE) platform that supports the implementation and deployment of a CDSS.

methodsCDSS reasoning engines, usually represented as R or Python objects, are deployed into the CANE platform and converted into C# objects. When a clinician requests CANE-based decision support in the electronic health record (EHR) system, patients' information is transformed into Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) format and transmitted to the CANE server inside the hospital firewall. Upon receiving the necessary data, the CANE system's modules perform the following tasks: (1) the preprocessing module converts the FHIRs into the input data required by the specific reasoning engine, (2) the reasoning engine module operates the target algorithms, (3) the integration module communicates with the other institutions' CANE systems to request and transmit a summary report to aid in decision support, and (4) creates a user interface by integrating the summary report and the results calculated by the reasoning engine.

resultsWe developed a CANE system such that any algorithm implemented in the system can be directly called through the RESTful application programming interface when it is integrated with an EHR system. Eight algorithms were developed and deployed in the CANE system. Using a knowledge-based algorithm, physicians can screen patients who are prone to sepsis and obtain treatment guides for patients with sepsis with the CANE system. Further, using a nonknowledge-based algorithm, the CANE system supports emergency physicians' clinical decisions about optimum resource allocation by predicting a patient's acuity and prognosis during triage.

conclusionsWe successfully developed a common data model-based platform that adheres to medical informatics standards and could aid artificial intelligence model deployment using R or Python.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalSepsisArtificial IntelligenceElectronic Health RecordsHealth Level SevenHumansKnowledge Basesalgorithmclinical decisionclinical decision support systemcommon data modeldecision aiddecision makingdecision supportdevelopmentEHRelectronic health recordEMRFast Healthcare Interoperability Resourcehealth technologyintelligent algorithm networkinteroperabilitymachine learningmedical recordmodelmodeling

Identifiers

PMID35896020
PMCPMC9377482
OpenAlexW4288051412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.